doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1440-1444
Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]
Article history: Received: 07-07-2018, Accepted: 05-09-2018, Published online: 17-10-2018
Corresponding author: Kalyani Putty
E-mail: kalyaniputty@gmail.com
Citation: Jyothi JS, Putty K, Reddy YN, Dhanalakshmi K, Umair MAH (2018) Antagonistic effect of ursolic acid on staphylococcal biofilms, Veterinary World, 11(10): 1440-1444.Aim: The present study was carried out to study the effect of ursolic acid (UA) as a potential anti-biofilm agent in dispersing the biofilm generated by Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk samples of crossbred dairy cows on the day of drying. Further, in the S. aureus isolates, the presence of intracellular adherence gene locus involved in biofilm production (icaD) was investigated.
Materials and Methods: A total of 50 S. aureus strains were isolated over a period of 3 months from 200 milk samples collected from crossbred dairy cows on the day of drying. These isolates were subjected for biofilm detection by Congo red agar (CRA), microtiter plate assay (MTP), and polymerase chain reaction specific for icaD gene. The antagonistic effect of biofilm formation by UA was studied using different concentrations (30 μg/ml and 60 μg/ml) of UA and compared with the control group.
Results: Among the 50 S. aureus subjected for biofilm detection, 34 and 40 isolates were detected as biofilm agents by CRA and MTP methods, respectively. The in vitro studies on the effect of UA in inhibiting biofilm formation by S. aureus using MTP assay showed 71.5% and 48.6% inhibition at UA concentrations of 60 μg/ml and 30 μg/ml, respectively, with a significant difference (p<0.05) between the treated and untreated isolates, which was further evident by scanning electron microscopy. Interestingly, the isolates that were tested to be resistant through Antibiotic Sensitivity Test to commonly used antibiotics were found to be sensitive to all the tested antibiotics following UA treatment at both the tested concentrations. Furthermore, molecular detection of icaD gene for biofilm detection revealed that all the isolates that were positive by MTP had icaD gene.
Conclusion: Increased incidence of biofilm agents in dairy infections must be considered as an alarming situation. UA treatment significantly enhanced the sensitivity of the microbial pathogens to commonly used antibiotics. Hence, attention must be paid toward implementation of new strategies such as therapeutic regimes with a combination of antibiotic and anti-biofilm agents for effective treatment of infections in dairy farms.
Keywords: biofilms, icaD, Staphylococcus aureus, ursolic acid.
1. Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J.W. and Stoodley, P. (2004) Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2(2): 95-108. [Crossref] [PubMed]
2. Lear, G. and Lewis, G.D. (2012) Microbial Biofilms: Current Research and Applications. Caister Academic Press, Wymondham.
3. Sadekuzzaman, M., Yang, S., Mizan, M.F.R. and Ha, S.D. (2015) Current and recent advanced strategies for combating biofilms. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 14(5), 48-66. [Crossref]
4. Melchior, M.B., Vaarkamp, H. and Fink-Gremmels, J. (2006) Biofilms: A role in recurrent mastitis infections? Vet. J. 171(3): 398-407. [Crossref] [PubMed]
5. Cramton, S.E., Gerke, C., Schnell, N.F., Nichols, W.W. and Gotz, F. (1999) Intracellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun., 67(10): 5427-5433. [PubMed] [PMC]
6. Vasudevan, P., Nair, M.K.M., Annamalai, T. and Venkitanarayanan, K.S. (2003) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol., 92(1-2): 179-185. [Crossref]
7. Haghighi, F., Mohammadi, S.R., Mohammadi, P., Hosseinkhani, S. and Shidpour, R. (2013) Antifungal activity of TiO2 nanoparticles and EDTA on Candida albicans biofilms. Infect. Epidemiol. Med., 1(1): 33-38.
8. Packiavathy, I.A., Priya, S., Pandian, S.K. and Ravi, A.V. (2014) Inhibition of biofilm development of uropathogens by curcumin an anti-quorum sensing agent from Curcuma longa. Food Chem., 148: 453-460. [Crossref] [PubMed]
9. Molan, P.C. (1992) The antibacterial nature of honey. The nature of the antibacterial activity. Bee World., 73(1): 5-28. [Crossref]
10. Maddocks, S.E., Lopez, M.S., Rowlands, R.S. and Cooper, R.A. (2012) Manuka honey inhibits the development of Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms and causes reduced expression of two ?bronectin binding proteins. Microbiology, 158(Pt 3): 781-790. [Crossref] [PubMed]
11. Sandra, S.L. (2014) Essential oil show specific inhibitory effects on bacterial biofilm formation. Food Control, 36(1): 224-229. [Crossref]
12. Rossoni, R.D., Barbosa, J.O., Oliveira, F.E., Oliveira, L.D., Jorge, A.C. and Junqueira, J.C. (2014) Biofilms of Candida albicans serotypes A and B differ in their sensitivity to photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med. Sci., 29(5): 1679-1684. [Crossref] [PubMed]
13. Padmavathi, A.R. and Pandian, S.K. (2014) Antibiofilm activity of biosurfactant producing coral associated bacteria isolated from Gulf of Mannar. Indian J. Microbiol., 54(4): 376-382. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
14. Sambanthamoorthy, K., Feng, X., Patel, R., Patel, S. and Paranavitana, C. (2014) Antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from lactobacilli against multi-drug-resistant pathogens. BMC Microbiol., 14(1): 197. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
15. Pradhan, A.K., Pradhan, N., Sukla, L.B., Panda, P.K. and Mishra, B.K. (2014) Inhibition of pathogenic bacterial biofilm by biosurfactant produced by Lysinibacillus fusiformis S9. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng., 37(2): 139-149. [Crossref] [PubMed]
16. Wu, Z.Y., Ye, C.S., Guo, F., Zhang, S.H. and Yu, X. (2013) Evidence for broad-spectrum biofilm inhibition by the bacterium Bacillus spp strain SW9. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 79(5): 1735-1738. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
17. Pradhan, A.K., Pradhan, N., Mall, G., Panda, H.T., Sukla, L.B., Panda, P.K. and Mishra, B.K. (2013) Application of lipopeptide biosurfactant isolated from a halophile: Bacillus tequilensis CH for inhibition of biofilm. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 171(47): 1362-1375. [Crossref] [PubMed]
18. Yamakami, K., Tsumori, H., Sakurai, Y., Shimizu, Y., Nagatoshi, K. and Sonomoto, K. (2013) Sustainable inhibition ef?cacy of liposome-encapsulated nisin on insoluble glucan-biofilm synthesis by Streptococcus mutans. Pharm. Biol., 51(2): 267-270. [Crossref] [PubMed]
19. Marvasi, M., Carrazana, M., Durie, I. and Teplitski, M. (2014) Systemic analysis of the ability of nitric oxide donors to dislodge biofilms formed by Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli O157: H7. AMB Express, 4(1): 42. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
20. Wozniak, T., Skapska, S. and Marszatek, K. (2015) Ursolic acid - A pentacyclic triterpenoid with a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. Molecules, 20(11): 20614-20641. [Crossref] [PubMed]
21. Ren, D., Zuo, R., Gonz'alez-Barrios, A.F., Bedzyk, L.A., Eldridge, G.R., Pasmore, M.E. and Wood, T.K. (2005) Differential gene expression for investigation of Escherichia coli biofilm inhibition by plant extract ursolic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 71(7): 4022-4034. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
22. Cruickshank, R., Duguid, J.P., Marmion, B.P. and Swain, R.H.A. (1975) Medical Microbiology. 12th ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
23. Patricia, T. (2012) Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 14th ed. Mosby, Elsevier, Netherlands.
24. Mathur, S.T.S., Khan, S., Upadhyay, D.J., Fatma, T. and Rattan, A. (2006) Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of staphylococci: An evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J. Med. Microbiol., 24(1): 25-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
25. Dubravka, M., Lazis, V.B., Petrovi, J., Bugarski, D. and Eguljev, Z. (2010) Slime production and biofilm-forming ability by Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis isolates. Acta Vet., 60(2-3): 217-226. [Crossref]
26. Stepanovic, S., Dakic, I., Opavski, N., Jezek, P. and Ranin, L. (2003) Influence of the growth medium composition on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus sciuri. Ann. Microbiol, 53(1): 63-74.
27. Lasa, I and Penades, J. (2006) Bap: A family of surface proteins involved in biofilm foration. Res. Microbiol., 157(2): 99-107. [Crossref] [PubMed]
28. Kaplan, J.B., Ragunath, C., Velliyagounder, K., Fine, D.H. and Ramasubbu, N. (2004) Enzymatic detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 48(7): 2633-2636. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
29. Samah, F., Darwish, A. and Hanaa, A.E. (2013) Investigation of biofilm-forming ability in staphylococci causing bovine mastitis using phenotypic and genotypic assays. Sci. World J., 2013(37): 9.
30. Nan, Q., Tan, X., Jiao, Y., Liu, L., Zhao, W., Yang, S. and Jia, A. (2014) RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm inhibition by ursolic acid and resveratrol. Sci. Rep., 4: 5467.
31. Awad, A., Ramadan, H., Nasr, S., Ateya, A. and Atwa, S. (2017) Genetic characterization, antimicrobial resistance patterns and virulence determinants of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 20(6): 298-305. [Crossref] [PubMed]
32. Stewart, P.S. (2015) Prospects for anti-biofilm pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceuticals, 8(3): 504-511. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
33. Kaplan, J.B. (2009) Therapeutic potential of biofilm-dispersing enzymes. Int. J. Artif. Organs., 32(9): 533-695. [Crossref]
34. Izano, E.A., Amarante, M.A., Kher, W.B. and Kaplan, J.B. (2008) Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 74(2): 470-476. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]