Open Access
Research (Published online: 10-05-2021)
10. Antibacterial effect of acidic ionized water on horse wounds bacterial isolates
Afiqah Zafirah Abdul Rahman, Noraniza Mohd Adzahan, Zunita Zakaria and Abubakar Musa Mayaki
Veterinary World, 14(5): 1128-1132

Afiqah Zafirah Abdul Rahman: Department of Farm and Exotic Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Noraniza Mohd Adzahan: Department of Farm and Exotic Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Zunita Zakaria: Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Abubakar Musa Mayaki: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, PMB2346, City ampus, Sokoto, Nigeria.

doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1128-1132

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 09-12-2020, Accepted: 25-03-2021, Published online: 10-05-2021

Corresponding author: Noraniza Mohd Adzahan

E-mail: noraniza@upm.edu.my

Citation: Rahman AZA, Adzahan NM, Zakaria Z, Mayaki AM (2021) Antibacterial effect of acidic ionized water on horse wounds bacterial isolates, Veterinary World, 14(5): 1128-1132.
Abstract

Background and Aim: Horse wounds can be easily infected with bacteria depending on the nature of its cause such as laceration, abrasion, or puncture as well as the nature of its environment. Various treatments are available in managing open wounds, including the usage of topical antibiotics and antiseptics. However, antibiotic resistance has been a major concern attributed with chronic wound infection. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of ionized water at different pH against the growth of common bacteria from horse wounds.

Materials and Methods: Ten swab samples from equine infected wounds were collected and bacteria isolation and identification were performed. The antibacterial effect of the ionized water of pH 2.5, 4.5, 7.0, and 11.5 was tested on Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus intermedius, Escherichia coli, Pantoea agglomerans, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The time-kill profiles of the ionized waters were determined at time 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h.

Results: Ionized water of pH 2.5 and 4.5 showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus, S. pseudintermedius, and S. intermedius with significant (p>0.05) reduction in colony-forming unit/mL within 2-8 h. The degree of bactericidal effect of the acidic ionized water differs between the species with S. intermedius more susceptible. However, there was no antibacterial effect at pH 2.5, 4.5, 7.0, and 11.5 on the Gram-negative bacteria tested.

Conclusion: Ionized water of pH 2.5 and 4.5 is effective in minimizing the growth of Gram-positive bacteria; thus it could be of clinical importance as an antiseptic for surface wound lavage in horses.

Keywords: bacterial growth, ionized water, horse, wounds.