Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online: 21-04-2014)
14. The evaluation of metabolizable
protein content of some indigenous feedstuffs used in ruminant
nutrition - Lalatendu Keshary Das, S. S. Kundu, Dinesh
Kumar and Chander Datt
Veterinary World, 7(4): 257-261
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2014.257-261
Lalatendu Keshary Das: Veterinary Dispensary, Kalampur,
Kalahandi, Odisha, India.
S. S. Kundu: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National
Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Dinesh Kumar: Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian
Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India
Chander Datt: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National
Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Received: 01-02-2014, Revised: 20-03-2014, Accepted: 25-03-2014,
Published online: 21-04-2014
Corresponding author:
Lalatendu Keshary Das, email: drlalatendu27@gmail.com
Abstract
Aim: To determine the
metabolizable protein (MP) content of common indigenous feedstuffs
used in ruminant nutrition using in situ method.
Materials and Methods: Nine ruminant feeds such as maize
grain (MG), groundnut cake (GNC), mustard oilcake (MOC),
cottonseed cake (CSC), deoiled rice bran (DORB), wheat bran (WB),
berseem fodder (BF), maize fodder (MF) and sorghum fodder (SF)
were included in this study. Each test feed was dried, ground and
chemically analysed for proximate principles (DM, CP, EE, OM,
Total ash), fiber fractions (NDF, ADF, cellulose, hemicellulose,
lignin), NDICP and ADICP. Two adult fistulated bulls were used for
evaluating the protein degradation characteristics of each test
feed using the nylon bag method. Metabolizable energy (ME) content
of the test feeds were predicted from their chemical composition
data using summative approach of NRC (2001) model. The equations
of AFRC (1992) were used to predict the rumen degradable protein (RDP),
digestible microbial protein (DMP), digestible undegraded feed
protein (DUP) and MP content of test feeds.
Results: The MP content of MG, GNC, MOC, CSC, DORB, WB, BF,
MF and SF was found to be 95.26, 156.41, 135.21, 125.06, 101.68,
107.11, 136.81, 72.01 and 76.65 g/kg DM, respectively. The
corresponding ME (MJ/kg DM) content of the test feeds was 13.66,
13.12, 13.65, 10.68, 9.08, 11.56, 9.64, 8.33 and 8.03,
respectively. Among the test feeds, GNC contained the highest and
MF contained the lowest MP per kg DM.
Conclusion: It was concluded that the degradability of
crude protein (CP) of the test feeds can be used in MP
determination and diet formulation. Feed CP content is not
available as such at intestinal level in ruminants as a definite
part of it undergoes extensive microbial degradation in rumen. The
pattern and extent of such degradation do influence the amount of
protein presented to lower digestive tract (MP) for absorption and
utilization in ruminants. It was also found that the MP content of
a feed is not constant as that of its CP content as it entirely
depends on the degradation characteristics in a given animal.
Keywords: in situ method, metabolizable energy,
metabolizable protein, microbial protein, ruminant nutrition.
References
1. Burroughs, W., Trenkle, A. and Vetter, R.L. (1974) A system
of protein evaluation for cattle and sheep involving
metabolizable protein (amino acids) and urea fermentation
potential of feedstuffs. Vet. Med. Sm. Anim. Clin. 69: 713.
PMid:4494868 |
|
2. ARC. (1984) The nutrient requirements of ruminant
livestock. Suppl. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux,
Slough, UK. |
|
3. Orskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. (1979) The estimation of
protein degradability in the rumen from incubation
measurements weighed according to rate of passage. J. Agr. Sci.
(Cambridge). 92: 499-505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048 |
|
4. Islam, M.R., Ishida, M., Ando, S., Nishida, T. and Yoshida,
N. (2011) Whole crop rice silage: Prediction of yield and
content of metabolizable energy, metabolizable protein and
other nutrients for dairy cows from crop maturity and
botanical fractions at harvest. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 163:
222-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.007 |
|
5. Pooponpan, P., Chinrasri, O., Saenthaweesuk, S. and
Chantiratikul, A. (2011) Evaluation of metabolizable protein
and metabolizable energy values of Wolffia meal [Wolffia
globosa (L). Wimm.] in broilers. Int J Poult Sci, 10(5): 401-
403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.401.403 |
|
6. Rahbarpour, A., Palangi, V., Eivagi, P. and Jalili, M.
(2012) Calculation of metabolizable protein and energy of
tomato pomace by nylon bags and gas production datas. Eur. J.
Exp. Bio., 2(3): 822-825. |
|
7. Weiss, W.P., St-Pierre, N.R. and Willett, L.B. (2009)
Varying type of forage, concentration of metabolizable
protein, and source of carbohydrate affects nutrient
digestibility and production by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.,
92(11): 5595-5606.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2247
PMid:19841220 |
|
8. Rius, A.G., Mcgilliard, M.L., Umberger, C.A. and Hanigan,
M.D. (2010) Interactions of energy and predicted metabolizable
protein in determining nitrogen efficiency in the lactating
dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93(5): 2034-2043.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1777
PMid:20412918 |
|
9. Aboozar, M. (2012) Impacts of dietary metabolizable protein
on performance and ruminal parameters of Holstein cows at
early lactation. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2(2): 102- 108. |
|
10. Lee, C., Hristov, A. N., Heyler, K. S. and Cassidy, T. W.
(2012) Effect of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid
supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and
ammonia emission from manure in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.,
95(9): 5253-5268.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5366
PMid:22916930 |
|
11. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of
Official Analytical Chemists. 18th ed. Virginia, USA. |
|
12. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991)
Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and
nutritional implications. In dairy cattle. Methods for dietary
fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides
in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 |
|
13. Licitra. G., Harnandez, T.M. and Van Soest, P.J. (1996).
Standardizations of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of
ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 57: 347-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3 |
|
14. NRC. (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th
Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. |
|
15. AFRC. (1992) Nutritive requirements of ruminant animal:
Protein Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. CAB Int. Walling
Ford. Oxon, 62: 787-835. |
|
16. Ramirez, R.G., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, H., Morales- Rodriguez,
R., Cerrillo-Soto, A., Juarez-Reyes, A., Garcia- Dessommes,
G.J. and Guerrero-Cervantes, M. (2009) Chemical composition
and dry matter digestion of some native and cultivated grasses
in Mexico. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 54: 150–162. |
|
17. Statistical packages for social sciences 16.0. (2010).
SPSS Inc., 233, South walker Drive, 11th floor, Chicago, USA.
II. 60606. |
|
18. CNCP. (2003) The net carbohydrate and protein system for
evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. CNCPS
Version 5.0., Cornell University. 130 Morrison Hall, Ethaca,
New York. |
|
19. Singh, R. and Kundu, S.S. (2008) Estimates of energy and
protein fractions of concentrate ingredients used in India.
Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 25 (4): 302-312. |
|
20. Sampath, K.T., Rao, A.S. and Sampath, S.R. (1989) Ruminal
protein degradability of certain feedstuffs by nylon bag
technique. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 59 (10): 1304-1307. |
|
21. Wadhwa, M., Makkar, G.S. and Ichhponani, J.S. (1993) In
sacco degradability of protein supplements used in ruminant
ration. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 63 (6): 684-686. |
|