Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online: 29-04-2014)
17.
Comparative anatomical study on
infundibulum of Pati and Chara-Chemballi ducks (Anas platyrhynchos
domesticus) during laying periods
- Anil Deka, Gajen Baishya, Kabita Sarma and Manjyoti
Bhuyan
Veterinary World, 7(4): 271-274
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2014.271-274
Anil Deka: Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Histology,
College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University,
Khanapara, Guwahati- 781022, Assam, India.
Gajen Baishya: Department of Veterinary Anatomy and
Histology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural
University, Khanapara, Guwahati- 781022, Assam, India.
Kabita Sarma: Department of Veterinary Anatomy and
Histology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural
University, Khanapara, Guwahati- 781022, Assam, India.
Manjyoti Bhuyan: Department of Animal Reproduction,
Gynaecology & Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Science, Assam
Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati- 781022, Assam,
India.
Received: 27-02-2014, Revised: 24-03-2014, Accepted: 27-03-2014,
Published online: 29-04-2014
Corresponding author: Manjyoti
Bhuyan, email: mitumanjyoti@gmail.com
Abstract
Aim: The present
investigation was undertaken to establish anatomical norms on
gross anatomical, histomorphological and histochemical parameters
of infundibulum of Pati and Chara-Chemballi ducks.
Materials and Methods: In the present investigation, 12
(twelve) each Pati and Chara-Chemballi ducks in their laying
period (42 weeks age) were utilized.
Results: The mean length, breadth, thickness and weight of
infundibulum were significantly higher in Chara-Chemballi duck
than Pati duck. Though most of the histological parameters are
almost similar, but the mean height of lamina epithelialis mucosae
was significantly higher in Chara-Chemballi duck (30.234±0.389 µm)
than in Pati duck (23.906±0.332 µm). PAS reaction was moderate at
apical part of lining epithelium in Chara-Chemballi duck whereas
the same is weak in Pati duck.
Conclusion: Result obtained showed that the Chara-Chemballi
duck revealed significant difference in all the parameters as
compared to Pati duck.
Keywords: anatomy, Chara-Chemballi, duck, infundibulum,
Pati.
References
1. Kalita, N., Barua, N., Bhuyan, J. and Chidananda B. L.
(2009) Present status of duck farming in Assam. Proceeding of
4th world waterfowl conference. Thrissur, India, p359-363. |
|
2. Mahanta, D. J., Deka, R. J., Supcota, D. and Jalaludeen, A.
(2009) Certain performances traits of Chara-Chemballi ducks of
Kerala under range condition in Assam. Proceeding of 4th world
waterfowl conference. Thrissur, India, p136-138. |
|
3. Patki, H. S., Lucy, K. M., Harshan, K. R. and Chungath, J.
J. (2009) Morphological studies on the infundibulum of
Kuttanad duck (Anas Platyrhynchos domesticus) during postnatal
period. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 40: 22-25. |
|
4. Aitken, R. N. C. and Johnston, H. S. (1963) Observation on
the fine structure of the infundibulum of the avian oviduct.
J. Anat. 97: 87-89.
PMid:14011451 PMCid:PMC1244259 |
|
5. Hodges, R. D. (1974) The histology of Fowl. Academic Press,
London, p648. |
|
6. King, A. S. (1975) Aves-Urogenital system. In:Getty, R.(Ed.)
Sisson and Grossman's the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th
Ed. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p1935-1959. |
|
7. Nickel, R., Schummer, A. and Sieferle, E. (1977) Anatomy of
the Domestic Birds. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, p202. |
|
8. Gracey, J. F. (1968) Bleeding method of slaughtering-
slaughter. Meat Hygiene. 8th Ed. p144-145. |
|
9. McCance, R. A. (1974) The effect of age on the weights and
lengths of pig's intestine. J. Anat.117 (3): 475-479.
PMid:4419517 PMCid:PMC1231455 |
|
10. Luna, L.G. (1968) Manuals of histological staining methods
of armed forces institute of pathology, 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill
Book Co., London, p 37-193. |
|
11. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. (1967) Statistical
Methods. 6th Ed. University Press Ames, Iowa, USA, p 120-134. |
|
12. Fujii, S.,Yoshimura,Y., Okamoto, T. and Tamura, T. (1981)
The regional morphology of the infundibulum of the hen's
oviduct with special reference to the mechanism of the
engulfing of the ovulated ovum. J. Fac. App. Bio. Sci. 10:
87-94. |
|
13. Saber, A. S., Emara, S. A. M. and Abosaeda, O. M. M.
(2010) Light, Scanning and transmission electron microscopical
study on the oviduct of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). J.
Vet. Anat. 2(2): 79-89. |
|
14. Sharaf, A., Eid, W. and Atta, A. A. A. (2012)
Morphological aspect of the ostrich infundibulum and magnum.
Bulg. J. Vet. Med.15 (3): 145-159. |
|
15. Balasundaram, K., Kumar, V. and Paramasivan, S. (2014)
Light microscopy of the infundibulum and magnum of Emu (Dromaius
novaehollandiae). Proceeding of the 28th National Symposium on
Veterinary Anatomy Vision 2050- Improvement, Challenges and
opportunities in Relation to Animal as well as Human Health
and Biodiversity. Bikaner, Rajasthan, p127. |
|
16. Romanoff, A. L. and Romanoff A. J. (1949) The Avian Egg.
New York; John Wiley, p918. |
|
17. Khokhlov, R.Y. (2008) Morphology of an infundibulum of the
oviduct of the sexually mature hens. Int. J. Mor. 26(4):
883-886. |
|
18. Parto, P., Khaksar, Z., Akramifard, A. and Moghii, B.
(2011) The microstructure of oviduct in laying turkey hen as
observed by light and scanning electron microscopies. World J.
Zoo.6 (2): 120-125. |
|
19. Bacha, W. J. and Bacha, L. M. (1990) Color Atlas of
Veterinary Histology. 2nd Ed. Black well, p224. |
|
20. Moraes, C., Baraldi-Artoni, S. M., Pacheco, M. R.,
Nishizawa, M. and Nakaghi, L. S. O. (2010) Morfologia e
histologia do oviduct de marrecas Ana boschas. Arq. Bras. Med.
Vet. Zootec. 62(2): 293-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000200008 |
|
21. Mehta, S. and Guha, K. (2012) Comparative Histological
study on the oviduct of developing and laying hens (Gallus
domesticus). Ind. J. Vet. Anat. 24(2): 92-94. |
|
22. Patki, H. S., Lucy, K. M. and Chungath, J. J. (2013)
Histological observation on the Infundibulum of Kuttanad duck
(Anas platyrhynchos domesticus) during postnatal periods. Int.
J. Sci. and Res. Pub.3 (1): 1-8. |
|
23. Mirhish, M. S. and Nsaif, H. R. (2013) Histological study
of the ovary and infundibulum of Turky hen (Meleagris
gallopavo). Ba. J. Vet. Res. 12(2):11-16. |
|
24. Lucy, K. M. and Harshan, K. R. (1999) Structure and
postnatal development of infundibulum in Japanese quail.
Indian J. Poult. Sci. 34(2): 125-128. |
|
25. Ghule, P. M., Gaikwad, S. A., Dhande, P. L., Lambate, S.
B., Patil, A. D., Tiwari, S.S. and Ayana, R. (2010)
Histomorphological study of the oviduct in Japanese quail.
Indian J. Vet. Anat. 23 (1): 40-42. |
|
26. Geetha, S.,Venkatakrishan, A. and Vijayaragavan, C. (1992)
A preliminary study of the histomorphology and histochemistry
of the oviduct of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).
Indian J. Vet. Anat. 4: 96-97. |
|
27. Mohammadpour, A. A. and Keshtmandi M. (2008)
Histomorphophometrical study of infundibulum and magnum in
Turkey and Pigeon. World J. Zoo. 3(2): 47-50. |
|
28. Bansal, N., Uppal, V., Pathak, D. and Brah, G. S. (2010)
Histochemical and histochemical studies on the oviduct of
Punjab White quails. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 45 (1): 88-92. |
|
29. Joaquim, E. and Baratella, L. (1997) Morphological and
histolochemical aspects of the luminal oviductal epithelium of
the laying and non-Laying muscovy duck (Cairina moschata,
Linneaus, 1758). Rev. Chil. de anat.15(2):1-13. |
|