|
Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online: 21-02-2014)
9.
Seroprevalence of vector borne parasites in naturally
exposed dogs of Assam, India - Kanta Bhattacharjee, P. C. Sarmah and
N. N. Barman
Veterinary World, 7(2):
87-89
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2014.87-89
Abstract
Aim: To determine the
seroprevalence of vector(tick)-borne Babesia canis, Babesia
gibsoni, Ehrlichia canis and Borrelia burgdorferi and
mosquito-borne Dirofilaria immitis in naturally exposed pet,
working, and street dogs in Assam, India.
Materials and Methods: Seroprevalence of B. canis and B.
gibsoni was determined using Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT)
kit and for D. immitis, E. canis and B. burgdorferi by Enzyme
Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) in SNAP 3DX kit. The results
along with blood microscopy findings were analyzed according to
different categories of dogs.
Results: The present study revealed the presence of Babesia
canis, Babesia gibsoni, Dirofilaria immitis, and Ehrlichia canis
usually in mixed infections. Seropositivity against B. gibsoni and
B. canis in IFAT was found comparatively higher in hospital dogs
(84.0% and 22.0%) than the street dogs (73.3% and 10%), whereas
evidence of D. immitis infection in SNAP 3DX ELISA was found
higher in street dogs (37.5%) than the hospital group (10%).
Antibody to E. canis was detected in hospital dogs (32.0%) only
and none of the dogs was found positive for Borrelia burgdorferi
in the same ELISA kit. Besides detection of B. canis, B. gibsoni,
D. immitis and E. canis in single or mixed infections, Hepatozoon
canis and Anaplasma platys were also recorded in 2.0% and 8.0%
respectively in hospital dogs and 3.33% and 6.66% in street dogs
during microscopic examination of blood.
Conclusion: High seroprevalence supported by microscopic
findings indicate a very strong influence of ticks and mosquitoes
as competent vectors in establishing an endemic situation for
different species of Babesia, Dirofilaria and Ehrlichia.
Keywords: babesia, dirofilaria, dog, Ehrlichia, IFAT, lyme
disease, tick, vector.
References
1. Megat Abd Rani, P.A., Irwin, P.J., Gatne, M. L., Coleman,
G.T. and Traub, R.J. (2010) Canine vector borne diseases in
India: A review of literature and identification of existing
knowledge gaps. Parasites &Vectors. 3: 28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-28 |
|
2. Shaw, S.E., Day, M.J., Birtles, R.J. and Breitschwerdt, E.B.
(2001) Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends
Parasitol. 17: 74-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1471-4922(00)01856-0 |
|
3. Singh, H., Mishra, A.K., Rao, J.R. and Tewari, A.K. (2007)
Seroprevalence of babesiosis in cattle and buffaloes by
indirect fluorescent antibody test. J Vet Parasitol. 21: 1-4. |
|
4. Baneth, G., Breitschwerdt, E.B., Hegarty, B.C., Pappalardo,
B. and Ryan, J. (1998) A survey of tick-borne bacteria and
protozoa in naturally exposed dogs from Israel. Vet. Parasitol.
74: 133-142.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00149-0 |
|
5. Irwin, P.J. (2009) Canine babesiosis: from molecular
taxonomy to control. Parasites & Vectors. 2: S4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-2-S1-S4 |
|
6. Senthil Kumar, K., Vairamuthu, S. and Kathiresan, D. (2009)
Prevalence of Haemoprotozoans in Canines in Chennai city.
Tamilnadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 5:
104-108. |
|
7. Mircean, V., Dumitrache, M.O., Gyorke, A., Panctchev, N.,
Jodies, R., Mihalca, A.D. and Cozma, V. (2012) Seroprevalence
and geographic distribution of Dirofilaria immitis and
tick-borne infections (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia
burgdorferi sensu lato, and Ehrlichia canis) in dogs from
Romania. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 12: 595-604.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2011.0915 |
|
8. Ndip, L.M., Ndip, R.N., Esemu, S.N., Dickmu, V.L., Fokam,
E.B., Walker, D.H. and McBride, J.W. (2005) Ehrlichial
infection in Cameroonian canines by Ehrlichia canis and
Ehrlichia ewingii. Vet. Microbiol. 111:59-66.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.08.010 |
|
9. Sun, M., Zhuo, W., Guo, S., Liao, S., Shi, D., Liu, J.,
Cheng, Z., Liu, Y., Niu, X., Wang, S. and Yang, D. (2012)
Serological survey of canine dirofilariasis in Chongqing,
Kunming, Nanchang, Fuzhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Nanning in
Southern China. Vet Parasitol. 185: 225-228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.035 |
|
10. Melendez, J.A.S., Gonzalez, E.P., Hernandez, B.V.T.,
Ramos, J.J.Z., Aranda, G.D., Ramirez, R.A., Martinez, M.A.C.
and Valdes, V.M.R. (2012) Prevalence of canine Heartworm in
Dogs from Monterrey, Mexico. J Anim Vet Adv . 11: 756-759.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2012.756.759 |
|
11. Bahadori, S.R., Eslami, A. and Bokaic, S. (2007)
Evaluation of different methods for diagnosis of Dirofilaria
immitis. Pakistan J Biol Sci. 10: 1938-1940.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.1938.1940 |
|
12. Tzipory, N., Crawford, P.C. and Levy, K.K. (2010)
Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis and
Borrelia burgdorferi in pet dog, racing greyhounds, and
shelter dogs in Florida. Vet. Parasitol. 171: 136-139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.03.016 |
|
13. Welc-Faleciak, R., Rodo, A., Sinski, E. and Bajer, A.
(2009) Babesia canis and other tick-borne infections in dogs
in Central Poland. Vet. Parasitol. 166: 191-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.038 |
|
14. Vasudevan, B. and Chatterjee, M. (2013) Lyme borreliosis
and skin. Indian J Dermatol . 58: 167-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.110822 |
|
15. Praharaj, A.K., Jetley, S. and Kalghatgi, A.T. (2008)
Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in North Eastern India.
MJAFI. 64: 26-28. |
|
|