Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online: 14-06-2014)
9. Studies on rumen magnet usage to
prevent hardware disease in buffaloes - O. S. Al-Abbadi,
A. M. Abu-Seida and S. M. Al-Hussainy
Veterinary World, 7(6): 408-411
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2014.408-411
O. S. Al-Abbadi: Ministry of Agriculture, Veterinary
Hospital at Nineveh, Iraq; Dr.oday76@ymail.com
A. M. Abu-Seida: Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology &
Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza,
PO-12211, Egypt; ashrafseida@cu.edu.eg, ashrafseida@yahoo.com
S. M. Al-Hussainy: Ministry of Agriculture, Veterinary
Hospital at Nineveh, Iraq; salammohammedali@yahoo.com
Received: 04-04-2014, Revised: 09-05-2014, Accepted: 15-05-2014,
Published online: 14-06-2014
Corresponding author: Ashraf M. Abu-Seida, email:
ashrafseida@cu.edu.eg, ashrafseida@yahoo.com
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the rumen
magnet given once a life as a prophylaxis of hardware disease in
buffaloes.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, 3100 buffaloes
were divided into two groups. In group I, 1200 hardware diseased
buffaloes were surgically treated with rumenotomy, given reticular
magnets and followed up to 7 years for a possible recurrent
hardware disease. In group II, 1900 clinically normal buffalo
heifers were given rumen magnets orally then followed up to seven
years for a possible occurrence of hardware disease. All buffaloes
showed signs of hardware disease were treated by rumenotomy. Data
were statistically analyzed using chi-square test.
Results: Hardware disease was recorded in 110 animals
(10.8%) and 155 animals (8.9%) in groups I and II. The incidence
of developing a hardware disease during the first 4 years after
the use of magnet was 0% in both groups. Starting from 5th year, a
time dependent increase in the proportion of buffaloes developing
a hardware disease was noticed in both groups (P < 0.05). The use
of magnets in group I provided the same level of protection as
that of group II since the overall proportions of the occurrence
of hardware disease during 7 years post magnet use were not
statistically different (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Administration of a rumen magnet is an
effective prophylaxis for hardware disease and reapplication of a
second new magnet is recommended four years later in buffaloes at
high risk.
Keywords: buffaloes, hardware disease, rumen magnet,
rumenotomy, sharp foreign body syndrome.
References
1. Nanda, A.S. and Nakao, T. (2003) Role of buffalo in the
socioeconomic development of rural Asia: Current status and
future prospectus. Anim. Sci. J., 74 (6): 443-455.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1344-3941.2003.00138.x |
|
2. Aref, N.M. and Abdel-Hakiem, M.A. (2013) Clinical and
diagnostic methods for evaluation of sharp foreign body
syndrome in buffaloes. Vet. World, 6 (9): 586-591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.586-591 |
|
3. Sileshi, N., Ramaswamy, V., Chandrashekhar, U. and Raja, N.
(2013) Studies on Foreign Body Ingestion and their Related
Complications in Ruminants Associated with Inappropriate Solid
Waste Disposal in Gondar Town, North West Ethiopia. Int. J. of
Anim. & Vet. Adv., 5 (2): 67-74. |
|
4. Abu-Seida, A. M. and Al-Abbadi, O.S. (2014) Recurrent Rumen
Tympany Caused by Trichobezoars in Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis):
A Series Report. Thai. J. Vet. Med., 44 (1): 147-151. |
|
5. Sharma, M.C. and Kumar, P. (2006) Foreign Body Syndrome in
Buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis): An Emerging Threat. Asian J. Anim.
Vet. Adv., 1: 89-98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2006.89.98 |
|
6. Radostitis, O.M., Gay, C.C., Blood, D.C. and Hinchcliff, W.
(2003) Veterinary Medicine. 9th ed., Book Power, UK. p405-
401. |
|
7. Semieka, M.A. (2010) Radiography of unusual foreign body in
ruminants. Vet. World, l3 (10): 473-475. |
|
8. Sharma, A.K., Lal, S.B. and Sharma, M.C. (1994) TRP and its
management in cattle. Livestock Advisor, 19: 20-25. |
|
9. Ramprabhu, R., Dhanpalan, P. and Prathaban, S. (2002)
Comprative efficacy of diagnostic test in the diagnosis of TRP
and allied syndrome in cattle. Isr. J. Vet. Med., 58: 2-3. |
|
10. Radostits, O.M., Gay, C., Hinchcliff, K.W. and Constable,
P. (2007) Diseases of the Spleen and Thymus in Veterinary
Medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep,
pigs and goats, 10th. ed., Elsevier, Philadelphia, p464-466. |
|
11. Umphrey, J. and Staples, C. (1992) General Anatomy of the
Ruminant Digestive System. Dairy Production Guide: 1-2. |
|
12. Ward, J.L. and Ducharme, N.G. (1994) TRP in dairy cows. J.
Am. Vet. Med. Assoc, 204: 874-877.
PMid:8188506 |
|
13. Rebhun, W.C. (1995) Diseases of Dairy Cattle. 1 sted.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, UK. p126-132. |
|
14. Ducharme, N.G. and Fubini, S.L. (2004) Surgery of the
Ruminant Forestomach Compartments. In: Farm Animal Surgery,
Fubini, S.L., N.G. Ducharme and W.B.S.T. Louis, (Eds.).
Saunders Co., UK. p186-188. |
|
15. Hofmeyr, C.F. (1988) The digestive system In: Textbook of
Large Animal Surgery. 2nded. Oehme FW (ed.) Baltitmore:
Williams & Wilkins: p448. |
|
16. Misk, N.A., Nigam, J.M. and Rifat, J.F. (1984) Management
of foreign body syndrome in Iraqi cattle. Agri. Practice, 5
(8): 19-21. |
|
17. Eddy, R.G. (1992) Alimentary Conditions. In: Bovine
Medicine Disease and Husbandry, Andrews, A.H. (Ed.). Blackwell
Scientific Publications, Oxford, p643-645. |
|