Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online: 06-05-2014)
4. Subclinical mastitis in machine milked
dairy farms in Punjab: prevalence, distribution of bacteria and
current antibiogram
- Abdul Q. Mir, B. K. Bansal and D. K. Gupta
Veterinary World, 7(5): 291-294
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2014.291-294
Abdul Q. Mir: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Guru Angad
Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana- 141 004,
Punjab, India.
B. K. Bansal: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Guru Angad
Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana- 141 004,
Punjab, India.
D. K. Gupta: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Guru Angad
Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana- 141 004,
Punjab, India.
Received: 21-02-2014, Revised: 24-03-2014, Accepted: 28-03-2014,
Published online: 06-05-2014
Corresponding author: B.
K. Bansal, email: baljinderbansal@rediffmail.com
Abstract
Aim: Mastitis, a complex
disease, even at subclinical stage has a major economic impact on
the dairy industry. The disease pattern at machine milking which
has recently been introduced in Indian system is to be studied.
Therefore the present study was conducted to see the prevalence,
distribution and sensitivity pattern of bacteria at subclinical
level in machine milked dairy farms in Punjab state.
Materials and Methods: The study involved 10 machine milked
dairy cow herds in Ludhiana, Patiala, Moga, Bathinda and Ferozpur
districts of Punjab. A total 218 HF × Sahiwal cross-bred dairy cow
in milk were studied. About 872 quarter foremilk samples were
collected to observe the prevalence of disease, distribution of
udder pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern.
Results: Prevalence of specific subclinical mastitis was
57.80 % and 30.73% on animal and quarter basis respectively. In
specific subclinical mastitis Staphylococci (41.04%) were the main
organisms while in case of latent infections Corynebacteria
(36.81%) were found to be chief isolates. Erythromycin,
Enrofloxacin and Gentamicin were found to be most sensitive, and
Streptomycin was found to be the least sensitive in vitro
antibiotic.
Conclusion: Staphylococci were the main organisms in
specific subclinical mastitis while Corynebacteria were found to
be chief isolates in case of latent infections. Erythromycin,
Enrofloxacin and Gentamicin were found to be most sensitive, and
Streptomycin was found to be the least sensitive in vitro
antibiotic.
Keywords: antibiogram, bacterial distribution, machine
milking, prevalence, subclinical mastitis.
References
1. Atasever, S. (2012) Estimation of correlation between
somatic cell count and coagulation score of bovine milk. Int.
J. Agr. Biol., 14: 315-317. |
|
2. Bachaya, H.A., Raza, M.A., Murtaza, S. and Akbar, I.U.R.
(2011) Subclinical bovine mastitis in Muzaffar Garh district
of Punjab (Pakistan). J. Anim. Pla. Sci., 21:16–19. |
|
3. Sahoo, N.R, Kumar, P., Bhusan, B., Bhattacharya, T.K.,
Dayal, S. and Sahoo, M. (2012) Lysozyme in livestock: a guide
to selection for disease resistance: a review. J. Anim. Sci.
Adva., 2: 347–360. |
|
4. Bansal, B. K. and Gupta, D. K. (2009). Economic analysis of
Bovine mastitis in India and Punjab-A review. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 62: 337–345. |
|
5. Olde Riekerink, R. G., Barkema, H. W. Kelton, D. F. and
Scholl. D. T. (2008a). Incidence rate of clinical mastitis on
Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci., 91:1366–1377.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0757
PMid:18349229 |
|
6. Guidry, A. J. (2007) Mastitis and the immune system of the
mammary gland. Lactation. In: Lauson B L. (ed) 2007. The Iowa
State University Press Ames, Iowa, USA. p229-62. |
|
7. Sumathi, B.R., Veeregowda, B.M. and Gomes, A. R. (2008)
Prevalence and antibiogram profile of bacterial Isolates from
clinical bovine mastitis. Vet. World, 1(8): 237-238. |
|
8. Buragohain, J. and Dutta, G. N. (1990) Susceptibility of
bovine subclinical mastitis organisms to different
antimicrobial agents and treatment. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 60:
550-553. |
|
9. Hogan, J. S., González, R. N., Harmon, R. J., Nickerson, S.
C., Oliver, S. P., Pankey, J. W. and Smith, K. L. (1999)
Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Revised edition,
National Mastitis Council, Madison, WI. Page no. 1-33. |
|
10. Ward, G. E. and Bates, F. (1983) Improved antimicrobial
susceptibility testing. Mod Vet Prac., 64: 795-98. |
|
11. Boro, P. K. (2002) Comparative studies on mastitis and
milk at machine milked and hand dairy farms'. M.V.Sc. Thesis,
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. |
|
12. Singh, P. J., Singh, K. B., Jand S. K., Dhingra, P. N. and
Nauriyal, D. C. (1994) Incidence, etiolgy and antibiogram of
pathogens isolated from subclinical mastitis in machine milked
cows. Indian J Dairy Sci., 47: 730-33. |
|
13. Prem Chand, Behra, G. D. and Chakravarty, A. K. (1995)
Comparative incidence of mastitis in relation to certain
factors in cattle and buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 65 (1):
12-14. |
|
14. Mekibib, B., Furgasa, M., Abunna, F., Megersa, B. and
Regassa, A. (2010) Bovine Mastitis: Prevalence, Risk Factors
and Major Pathogens in Dairy Farms of Holeta Town, Central
Ethiopia. Vet. World, 3 (9): 397-403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2010.397-403 |
|
15. Zeryehun, T., Aya, T. and Bayecha, R. (2013) Study on
prevalence, bacterial pathogens and associated risk factors of
bovine mastitis in small holder dairy farms in and around
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J. Anim. Pla. Sci., 23(1):50- 55. |
|
16. Saidi, R., Khelef, D. and Kaidi, R. (2013) Bovine
mastitis: Prevalence of bacterial pathogens and evaluation of
early screening test. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 7(9): 777-782. |
|
17. Elbably, M. A., Emeash H.H. and Asmaa, N.M. (2013) Risk
Factors Associated with Mastitis Occurrence in Dairy Herds in
Benisuef, Egypt. World's Vet. J., 3(1): 5-10. |
|
18. Sobe, I. (1979) Relationship between milking and udder
health in a Carinthian dairy. Dissertation Abstracts
International, C 39: 414 (Dairy Sci Abstr 43: 1633). |
|
19. Wesen, G. E., Luedecke, L. O. and Forster, T. L. (1968)
Relationship between California Mastitis Test reaction and
bacteriological analyses of stripping samples. J. Dairy Sci.,
51: 679-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(68)87055-9 |
|
20. Bradley, A. J. (2002) Bovine mastitis an evolving disease.
Vet. J., 164: 116-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2002.0724
PMid:12359466 |
|
21. Radostitis, O. M., Gay, C. C., Blood, D. C. and Hinchcliff,
K. W. (2007) Textbook of the diseases of Cattle, Sheep, Pigs,
Goats and Horses. 9th Edn. Bookpower, London. p603-700. |
|
22. Lam, T. J. G.M., Schukken, Y.H., van Vliet, J.H., Grommers,
F.J., Tielen, M. J.M. and Brand, A.(1997) Effect of natural
infections with minor pathogens on susceptibility to natural
infections with major pathogens in the bovine mammary gland.
Am. J. Vet. Res.,58:17–22.
PMid:8989490 |
|
23. Brooks, B. W. and Barnum, D. A. (1984) Experimental
colonization of the bovine teat duct with Corynebacterium
bovis and the effect on milk somatic cell counts. Can. J Comp.
Med., 48: 141-45.
PMid:6722643 PMCid:PMC1236026 |
|
24. Lacy-Hulbert, J. (1998) Physical characteristics of the
teat canal and the relationship with infection. Proceeding
37th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. p54-61. |
|
25. Mohanty, N.N., Das, P., Pany, S.S., Sarangi, L.N.,
Ranabijuli, S. and Panda, H. K. (2013) Isolation and
antibiogram of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and E. coli
isolate from clinical and subclinical cases of bovine
mastitis, Vet. World, 6(10): 739-743.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2013.739-743 |
|
26. Suha, A. H. (2012) Prevalence and Bacterial Etiology of
Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows in Al Sulaimaniyah
District. Kufa J Vet. Med. Sci., 3(1):190-203. |
|
27. Jeykumar, M., Vinodkumar, G., Bashir, B. P.
and Krovvidi, S. (2013) Antibiogram of mastitis pathogens in
the milk of crossbred cows in Namakkal district, Tamil Nadu,
Vet. World, 6(6):354-356.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.354-356 |
|