Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
R esearch
(Published online:
09-08-2015)
4.
Tissue reactivity and suture handling
characteristics of “jimat” against silk and chromic gut in cat
thigh muscle: A comparative study - Tilahun Bekele, A.
P. Bhokre and Abreha Tesfaye
Veterinary World, 8(8): 958-969
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2015.958-969
Tilahun
Bekele:
School of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and
Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, P. O. Box 307, Jimma,
Ethiopia; bekele.tilahun2@gmail.com
A. P.
Bhokre:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Mekelle University, P. O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia;
drbhokre@gmail.com
Abreha
Tesfaye:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine,
Mekelle University, P. O. Box 231, Mekelle, Ethiopia;
abreha2004@yahoo.com
Received:
31-03-2015, Revised: 03-07-2015, Accepted: 12-07-2015, Published
online: 09-08-2015
Corresponding author:
Tilahun Bekele, e-mail: bekele.tilahun2@gmail.com
Citation:
Bekele T, Bhokre AP,
Tesfaye A (2015) Tissue reactivity and suture handling
characteristics of “jimat” against silk and chromic gut in cat
thigh muscle: A comparative study, Veterinary World 8(8):
958-969.
Abstract
Aim:
This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tissue
reactivity and suture handling characteristics of chromic gut,
silk, and ‘jimat’ suture materials in cat thigh muscle.
Materials and Methods: This experimental study was conducted
from November, 2013 to April, 2014 in Kombolcha Animal Diseases
Survey, Research and Diagnostic Laboratory, Kombolcha, Ethiopia. A
total of 36 local breed male cats were randomly assigned into
chromic gut, silk, and “jimat” groups of 12 cats each as A, B, and
C, respectively. The hind leg muscle biceps femoris was incised
and sutured with suture materials according to their groups. The
muscle samples with its suture were collected at six different
days interval i.e. 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 and processed
histopathologically to assess the degree of leukocytic
infiltration and fibrous and granulation tissue formation (GTF).
In addition, all suture materials were evaluated intraoperatively
about their handling characteristics, by rating the precision of
knot tying, square knot positioning, and resistance to knot
slippage. The statistical analysis was done with two-way ANOVA,
Kruskal–Wallis, and Chi-square tests.
Results: The histopathology showed that “jimat” thread
(2.4±1.2) had produced least leukocytic infiltration than chromic
gut (4.5±1.9) and silk (4.3±1.5) sutures during the study period.
Higher GTF was seen at day 3 (6 [100%]), 7 (6 [100%]) and day 14
(4 [66.7%]) in all sutures, whereas “jimat” showed significantly
(p<0.05) higher fibrous tissue formation (10 [83.3%]) than others.
Moreover, “jimat” suture had equal suture handling characteristics
(p>0.05) with both chromic gut and silk.
Conclusion: The result indicated that a
single strand “jimat” thread appears to be the most satisfactory
suture material as regards to both tissue reaction and suture
handling characteristics for skeletal muscle approximation in cats
and provided that studies on its carcinogenic effects should be
done.
Keywords: handling characteristics,
histopathology, leukocytic infiltration, sutures, thigh muscle.
References
1. Parell, G. and Becker, G. (2003) Comparison of absorbable
with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
Arch. Facial Plast. Surg., 5: 488-490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.5.6.488
PMid:14623686 |
|
2. Abdessalem, F., Debbai, F., Jedda, H., Elmarzougui, S. and
Mokhtar, S. (2009) Tensile and knot performance of polyester
braided sutures. Text. Res. J., 79(3): 247-252.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040517508094090 |
|
3. Greenberg, J. (2010) The use of barbed sutures in
obstetrics and gynecology. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol., 2(2): 82-91. |
|
4. Fossum, T., Hedlund, C.S. and Johnson, A.L. (1997) Small
Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. Mosby, St. Louis, USA. p42. |
|
5. Bennett, R., Y'aeger, M., Trapp, A. and Cambre, R. (1997)
Histologic evaluation of the tissue reaction to five suture
materials in the body wall of rock doves (Columba livia). J.
Avian Med. Surg., 11: 175-182. |
|
6. Dunn, D. (2007) Wound Closure Manual. Ethicon: A Johnson
and Johnson Company, USA. p9-40. |
|
7. Bennett, R. (1988) Continuing medical education: Selection
of wound closure materials. J. Am. Acade. Dermatol., 18:
619-635.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70083-3 |
|
8. Fossum, T. (2002) Biomaterials, suturing, and hemostasis.
In: Fossum, T.W., Hedlund, C.S. and Johnson, A.L. editors.
Small Animal Surgery. 2nd ed. Mosby Publishing, St. Louis, MO.
p43-59. |
|
9. Hu, X. and Yang, H. (2000) Polyamide and polyester fibers.
J. Compos. Mater., 1: 227-244.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-042993-9/00060-7 |
|
10. Hochberg, J., Meyer, K. and Marion, M. (2009) Suture
choice and other methods of skin closure. Surg. Clin. N. Am.,
89: 627-641.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.001
PMid:19465201 |
|
11. Meyer, R. and Antonini, C. (1989) A review of suture
materials, Part II. In: Compendium of CME in dentistry.
Compendium., 10: 360-368.
PMid:2691090 |
|
12. Runk, A., Allen, S. and Mahaffey, E. (1999) Tissue
reactivity to poliglecaprone 25 in the feline lineaalba. Vet.
Surg., 28: 466-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.1999.00466.x
PMid:10582744 |
|
13. Cantini, M. and Carraro, U. (1995) Macrophage-released
factor stimulates selectively myogenic cells in primary muscle
culture. J. Neuropath. Exp. Neur., 54: 121-128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199501000-00014
PMid:7815074 |
|
14. Tidball, J. (2005) Inflammatory processes in muscle injury
and repair. Am. J. Physiol-Reg. I., 288: R345-R353. |
|
15. Sadove, A., Van Aalst, J. and Culp, J. (2004) Right palate
repair: Art and issues. Clin. Plast Surg., 21: 221-241. |
|
16. Gusman, N. (2012) Lower extremity soft tissue and
cutaneous plastic surgery: Suture materials and techniques.
Available from:
http://www.hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.sciencedirect.com/whalecom0/science/article/pii/B9780702021266000096:
Last accessed on 05-09-2014. |
|
17. Bizuwork, A., Kebede, N., Tibat, T., Tilahun, G. and
Kassa, T. (2013) Occurrences and financial significance of
bovine cystic echinococcosis in Southern Wollo, Northeastern
Ethiopia. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Health, 5(2): 51-56. |
|
18. Driscoll, G., Baird, P., Merkelbach, P. and Smith, D.
(1982) Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: A
histological comparison. Clin. Reprod. Fertil., 3: 151-156. |
|
19. Schoenenberger, A., Mettler, D., Roesler, H., Zimmermann,
A., Bilweis, J., Schilt, W. and Zingg, E. (1985) Surgical
repair of the kidney after blunt lesions of intermediate
degree using a Vicryl mesh: An experimental study. J. Urol.,
134: 804-808.
PMid:3875735 |
|
20. Miro, D., Julia, M. and Sitges-Serra, A. (1995) Wound
breaking strength and healing after suturing non-injured
tissues. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 180: 659-665.
PMid:7773478 |
|
21. Wainstein, M., Anderson, J. and Elder, J. (1997)
Comparison of effects of suture materials on wound healing in
a rabbit pyeloplasty model. Urology, 49(2): 261-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00440-2 |
|
22. Bhargava, D., Anantanarayanan, P., Prakash, G.,
Jayachandran, B. and Deshpande, A. (2013) Initial inflammatory
response of skeletal muscle to commonly used suture materials:
An animal model study to evaluate muscle healing after
surgical repair – Histopathological perspective. Med. Oral
Patol. Oral, 18(3): e491-e496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18608 |
|
23. Papazoglou, L., Tsioli, V., Papaioannou, N., Georgiadis,
M., Savvas, L., Prassinos, N., Kouti, V., Bikiaris, D.,
Hadzigiannakis, C. and Zavros, N. (2010) Comparison of
absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin
closure in cats. Can. Vet. J., 51: 770-772.
PMid:20885834 PMCid:PMC2885123 |
|
24. Powers, M., Beck, B. and Fonseca, R. (1997) Management of
soft tissue injuries. In: Fonseca, R.J., Walker, R.V. and
Betts, N.J. editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma.
Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co., USA. p792-854. |
|
25. Matičić, D., Kreszinger, M., Pirkić, B., Vnuk, D.,
Radišić, B. and Gračner, D. (2005) Comparative study of skin
closure in dogs with polypropylene and polyglactin 910. Vet.
Arch., 75(5): 282-290. |
|
26. Durmus, M. (2002) The effects of single-dose dexamethasone
on wound healing in rats. Anesth. Analg., 97: 1277-1280. |
|
27. Takahashi, M., Umehara, N., Suzuki, S. and Tezuka, M.
(2001) Analgesic action of a sustained release preparation of
diclofenac sodium in a canine urate-induced gonarthritis. J.
Health Sci., 47(5): 464-467.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1248/jhs.47.464 |
|
28. Kakoei, S., Baghaei, F., Dabiri, S., Parirokh, M. and
Kakooei, S. (2010) A comparative in vivo study of tissue
reactions to four suturing materials. Iran. Endod. J., 5(2):
69-73.
PMid:23130030 PMCid:PMC3487505 |
|
29. Filho, N., Matsumoto, A., Batista, A., Lopes, C., Góes, S.
and Consolaro, A. (2002) Comparative study of tissue response
to polyglecaprone 25, polyglactin 910 and
polytetrafluorethylene suture materials in rats. Braz. Dent.
J., 13(2): 86-91. |
|
30. Tidball, J. and Wehling-Henricks, M. (2007) Macrophages
promote muscle membrane repair and muscle fiber growth and
regeneration during modified muscle loading in mice in vivo.
J. Physiol., 578: 327-336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.118265
PMid:17038433 PMCid:PMC2075127 |
|
31. Fortes, M. and Sadi, M. (1996) An experimental comparative
study with absorbable sutures in bladder surgery. Rev. Col.
Bras. Cir., 23: 83. |
|
32. Andrade, M., Weissman, R. and Reis, S. (2006) Tissue
reaction and surface morphology of absorbable sutures after in
vivo exposure. J. Mater. Sci-Mater. M., 17: 949-961. |
|
33. Gabrielli, F., Potenza, C., Puddu, P., Sera, F., Masini,
C. and Abeni, D. (2001) Suture materials and other factors
associated with tissue reactivity, infection and wound
dehiscence among plastic surgery outpatients. Plast. Reconstr.
Surg., 107: 38-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200101000-00007
PMid:11176599 |
|
34. Yaltirik, M., Dedeoglu, K., Bilgic, B., Koray, M., Ersev,
H. and Issever, H. (2003) Comparison of four different suture
materials in soft tissues of rats. Oral Dis., 9: 284-290.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2003.00954.x
PMid:14629327 |
|
35. Selvig, K., Biagiotti, G., Leknes, K. and Wikesj¨o, U.
(1998) Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. Int. J.
Periodont. Rest., 18(5): 475-487. |
|
36. Özçaka, Ö., Arikan, F., Sönmez, Ş., Veral, A. and
Kendirci, S. (2010) Evaluation of the tissue reaction of five
different suture materials in rabbit palatal mucosa. EÜ Dişhek
Fak Derg., 31: 29-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/eudfd.2010.69875 |
|
37. Merly, F., Lescaudron, L., Rouaud, T., Crossin, F. and
Gardahaut. M. (1999) Macrophages enhance muscle satellite cell
proliferation and delay their differentiation. Muscle Nerve,
22: 724-732.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199906)22:6<724::AID-MUS9>3.0.CO;2-O |
|
38. Hurty, C., Brazik, D., Law, J., Sakamoto, K. and Lewbart,
G. (2002) Evaluation of the issue reactions in the skin and
body wall of koi (Cyprinuscarplo) to five suture materials.
Vet. Rec., 151: 324-328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.11.324
PMid:12356236 |
|
39. Kim, J., Shin, S., Herr, Y., Park, J., Kwon, Y. and Chung,
J. (2011) Tissue reactions to suture materials in the oral
mucosa of beagle dogs. J. Periodontal Implant Sci., 41:
185-191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2011.41.4.185
PMid:21954423 PMCid:PMC3175498 |
|
40. Altman, G., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R.,
Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J. and Kaplan, D. (2003)
Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials, 24: 401-410.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8 |
|
41. Setzen, G. and Williams, E. (1997) Tissue response to
suture materials implanted subcutaneously in a rabbit model.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 100: 1788-1795.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199712000-00023
PMid:9393477 |
|
42. Leknes, K., Røynstrand, L. and Selvig, K. (2005) Human
gingival tissue reactions to silk and expanded
polytetrafluoroethylene sutures. J. Periodontol., 76(1):
34-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.1.34
PMid:15830635 |
|
43. Kudur, M., Pai, S., Sripathi, H. and Prabhu, S. (2009)
Sutures and suturing techniques in skin closure. Indian J.
Dermatol. Vet., 75(4): 425-434.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.53155 |
|
44. Outlaw, K., Vela, A. and O'Leary, J. (1998) Breaking
strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo
exposure in the rat. Am. Surg., 64: 348-354.
PMid:9544148 |
|
45. Otten, J., Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad, M., Jahnke, H. and Pelz, K.
(2005) Bacterial colonization on different suture materials: A
potential risk for intraoral dentoalveolar surgery. J. Biomed.
Mater. Res. B., 74(1): 627-635.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30250
PMid:15889436 |
|
46. Banche, G., Roana, J. and Mandras, N. (2007) Microbial
adherence on various intraoral suture materials in patients
undergoing dental surgery. J. Oral Maxil. Surg., 65(8):
1502-1507.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.066 |
|
47. Yilmaz, N., İnal, S., Muğlali, M., Güvenç, T. and Baş, B.
(2010) Effects of polyglecaprone 25, Silk and Gut suture
materials on oral mucosa wound healing in diabetic rats: An
evaluation of nitric oxide dynamics. Med. Oral Patol. Oral.,
15(2): e526-e530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e526 |
|
48. Javed, F., Al-Askar, M., Almas, K., Romanos, G. and
Al-Hezaimi, K. (2012) Tissue reactions to various
suturematerials used in oral surgical interventions. ISRN
Dent., 31: 1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/762095
PMid:22645688 PMCid:PMC3356909 |
|
49. Abi Rached, R., Toledo, B. and Okamato, T. (1991) Reaction
of the human gingival tissue to different suture materials
used in periodontal surgery. Braz. Dent. J., 2: 103-106. |
|
50. De Nardo, G., Brown, N., Trenka-Benthin, S. and Marretta,
S. (1996) Comparison of seven different suture materials in
the feline oral cavity. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., 32:
164-172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5326/15473317-32-2-164
PMid:8680924 |
|
51. Parirokh, M., Asgary, S., Eghbal, M., Stowe, S. and
Kakoei, S. (2004) A scanning electron microscope study of
plaque accumulation on silk and PVDF suture materials in oral
mucosa. Int. Endod. J., 37: 776-781.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00873.x
PMid:15479260 |
|
52. Pi-eros-Fernandez, A., Salopek, L., Rodeheaver, P., Drake,
D., Edlich, R. and Rodeheaver, G. (2006) A revolutionary
advance in skin closure compared to current methods. J.
Long-Term Eff. Med., 16: 19-27. |
|
53. Tuttle, A., Law, J., Harms, C., Lewbart, G. and Harvey, S.
(2006) Evaluation of the gross and histologic reactions to
five commonly used suture materials in the skin of the African
clawed frog (Xenopuslaevis). J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim., 45:
22-26. |
|
54. Leknes, K., Selvig, K,.Bøe, O. and Wikesj¨o, U. (2005)
Tissue reactions to sutures in the presence and absence of
anti-infective therapy. J. Clin. Periodontol., 32(2): 130-138.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00647.x
PMid:15691341 |
|
55. Ribeiro, C., Júnior, S., Neto, S. and Vasconcelos, B.
(2005) Clinical and histopathological study of tissue
reactivity to monofilament suture materials: Nylon and
Poliglecaprone 25 in rats. Acta. Cir. Bras., 20: 284-291.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502005000400005
PMid:16186947 |
|
56. Silverstein, L. and Kurtzman, G. (2005) A review of dental
suturing for optimal soft-tissue management. Comp. Cont. Educ.
Dent., 26(3): 163-209.
PMid:15813570 |
|
57. Thompson, W., Harvey, J., Kazmi, M. and Stout, A. (1991)
Fibrinolysis and angiogenesis in wound healing. J. Pathol.,
165: 311-318.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.1711650406
PMid:1723752 |
|
58. Bellenger, C. (1982) Sutures. Part I. The purpose of
sutures and available suture materials. Comp. Cont. Educ.
Pract., 4: 507-518. |
|
59. Xu, J., Pollock, C. and Kajander, K. (1996) Chromic gut
suture reduces calcitonin-gene-related peptide and substance P
levels in the spinal cord following chronic constriction
injury in the rat. Pain, 64: 503-509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00172-7 |
|
60. La Bagnara, J. (1995) A review of absorbable suture
materials in head and neck surgery and introduction of
monocryl: A new absorbable suture. Ear Nose Throat J., 74:
409. |
|
61. Coker, C. (2009) An evidence based approach to soft tissue
approximation: A review of suture selection for optimal skin
closure. Available from:
http://www.podiatryinstitute.com/pdfs/Update_2009/2009_22.pdf:
Last accessed on 05-09-2014. |
|
62. Bernis-Filho, W., Wouters, F., Wouters, A., Bernis, V.,
Lopes, L. and Andreollo, N. (2013) Comparative study of
cotton, polyglactin and polyglecaprone sutures in intestinal
anastomoses in dogs. ABCD Arq. Bras. Cir. Dig., 26(1): 18-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202013000100005 |
|
63. Anderson, J. (1993) Mechanisms of inflammation and
infection with implanted devices. Cardiovasc. Pathol., 2:
33S-41S.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1054-8807(93)90045-4 |
|
64. Farid, S., Beniamino, P., Danielle, L. and Khalid, A.
(2008) An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance
in sealing the surgical wound lips. Int. J. Med. Sci., 5(6):
354-360. |
|
65. Saleh, F., Palmieri, B., Lodi, D. and Al-Sebeih, K. (2008)
An innovative method to evaluate the suture compliance in
sealing the surgical wound lips. Int. J. Med. Sci., 5:
354-360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.5.354
PMid:19015745 PMCid:PMC2583338 |
|
66. Faulkner, B., Tribble, C., Thacker, J., Rodeheaver, G. and
Edlich, R. (1996) Knot performance of polypropylene sutures.
J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 33: 187-192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199623)33:3<187::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-M |
|
67. Mulon, P., Zhim, F., Yahia, L. and Desrochers, A. (2010)
The effect of six knotting methods on the biomechanical
properties of three large diameter absorbable suturematerials.
Vet. Surg., 39: 561-565.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00634.x
PMid:20230595 |
|
68. Huber, D., Egger, E. and James, S. (1999) The effect of
knotting method on the structural properties of large diameter
nonabsorbable monofilament sutures. Vet. Surg., 28: 260-267.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/jvet.1999.0260
PMid:10424706 |
|
69. Schisterman, E., Perkins, N., Liu, A. and Bondell, H.
(2005) Optimal cut-point and its corresponding youden index
todiscriminate individuals using pooled blood samples.
Epidemiology, 16: 73-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000147512.81966.ba
PMid:15613948 |
|
70. Szarmach, R., Livingston, J. and Rodeheaver, G. (2002) An
innovative surgical suture and needle evaluation and selection
program. J. Long-Term Eff. Med., 12(4): 211-229. |
|
71. McFadden, M. (2011) Suture materials and suture selection
for use in exotic pet surgical procedures. J. Exot. Pet. Med.,
20(3): 173-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jepm.2011.04.003 |
|
72. Charbit, Y., Hitzig, C. and Bolla, M. (1999) Comparative
study of physical properties of three suture materials: Silk,
e-PTFE (Gore-Tex), and PLA/PGA (Vicryl). Biomed. Instrum.
Technol., 33: 71-75.
PMid:10067182 |
|
73. Greenberg, J. and Clark, R. (2009) Advances in suture
material for obstetric and gynecologic surgery. Rev. Obstet.
Gynecol., 2(2): 146-158.
PMid:19826572 PMCid:PMC2760901 |
|
74. Ammirati, C. (2002) Advances in wound closure material.
In: James, W., editor. Advances in Dermatology. 18th ed.
Mosby, St. Louis, MO. p313-338.
PMid:12528410 |
|
75. Bloom, B. and Golberg, D. (2007) Suture material in
cosmetic cutaneous surgery. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther., 9(1):
41-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14764170601140062 |
|
76. Roush, J. (2003) Biomaterials and surgical implants. In:
Slatter, D., editor. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 3rd ed.
Saunders, Philadelphia, PA. p141-148. |
|