Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

ISSN (Print): 0972-8988

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access

Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.


Research (Published online: 25-02-2015)

18. Study on inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and its combination in broiler diet and their effect on carcass characteristics and economics of commercial broilers - M. A. Saiyed, R. S. Joshi, F. P. Savaliya, A. B. Patel, R. K. Mishra and N. J. Bhagora

Veterinary World, 8(2): 225-231

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.225-231

 

M. A. Saiyed: Veterinary Dispensary Tarapur, District Panchayat Anand, Gujarat, India; dr.shahid92@gmail.com

R. S. Joshi: Department of Animal Genetics & Breeding, Veterinary College, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India; rsjoshi106@gmail.com

F. P. Savaliya: Poultry Complex, Veterinary College, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India; fpsavaliya@yahoo.com

A. B. Patel: Poultry Complex, Veterinary College, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India; patelab1411@yahoo.co.in

R. K. Mishra: Poultry Complex, Veterinary College, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India; rkmishra@gmail.com

N. J. Bhagora: Poultry Complex, Veterinary College, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, Gujarat, India; nikeshbhagora@ymail.com

 

Received: 09-12-2014, Revised: 03-01-2015, Accepted: 09-01-2015, Published online: 25-02-2015

 

Corresponding author: M. A. Saiyed, email: dr.shahid92@gmail.com


Citation: Saiyed MA, Joshi RS, Savaliya FP, Patel AB, Mishra RK, Bhagora NJ (2015) Study on inclusion of probiotic, prebiotic and its combination in broiler diet and their effect on carcass characteristics and economics of commercial broilers, Veterinary World 8(2):225-231.



Background and Aim: In today era, broiler industry facing a problem of price hiking of feed of broiler, also in competitive era there should be lower feed cost, lower feed conversion ratio, low feed consumption yet good body weight at marketable age.

Materials and Methods: Day-old commercial broiler chicks (n=200) were distributed randomly into 5 dietary treatment groups viz. control (T1), probiotic in the feed @ 100 g/tonne of feed (T2), prebiotic in the feed @ 500 g/tonne of feed (T3), probiotic + prebiotic @ 100 g/tonne and 500 g/tonne of feed, respectively (T4) and probiotic + prebiotic @ 50 g/tonne and 250 g/tonne of feed (T5). The growth of broilers and dressing weight along with the weight of giblet (liver without gall bladder, gizzard without serous layer, and heart without pericardium), Kidney, Abdominal fat, Length of Intestine and dressing percentage were measured. Economics in terms of Return Over Feed Cost (ROFC) and European Performance Efficiency Index (EPEI) was calculated.

Results: Among all carcass traits, dressing percentage, abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat percentage (as a percentage of dressed weight) were recorded significant (p<0.05) difference among different treatment groups. The income from selling of the birds was significantly (p<0.05) higher in all treatment groups than the control group but there was a non-significant difference between supplemented groups. Feed cost during whole experimental period was significantly (p<0.05) lower in synbiotic supplemented groups (T4 and T5) than other groups. ROFC of all treatment group found significantly (p<0.05) higher than the control group.

Conclusion: It can be concluded that the diet supplemented with synbiotic (100% level) was most efficient in terms of EPEI and synbiotic (50% level) in terms of ROFC. Hence, as feed supplement, synbiotic has a beneficial effect over probiotic and prebiotic when used alone.

Keywords: broiler, carcass traits, European Performance Efficiency Index, prebiotic, probiotic, Return Over Feed Cost, synbiotic.



1. Prabhakaran, R. (2012) Overview of poultry production in India vis-a-vis global scenario. In the Proceeding of XXIX Annual Conference and National Symposium of Indian Poultry Science Association (IPSACON-2012) on Commercial and Rural Poultry Production: Novel Concepts and Strategies to Meet Growing Demand and Changing Consumers Needs. 5th-7th December at Hyderabad. p3-11.
 
2. Kokje, R.P. (1999) Effect of feeding probiotics on growth performance in commercial broilers. M. V. Sc. Thesis Submitted to Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand.
 
3. Hinton, M., Kaukas, A. and Linton, A.H. (1986) The ecology of drug resistance in enteric lactobacilli on the performance of broilers. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 15: 77-92. (c. f. Sen, S. Ingale, S.L., Kim, Y.W., Kim, J.S., Kim, K.H., Lohakare, J.D., Kim, E.K., Kim, H.S., Ryu, M.H., Kwon, I.K. and Chae, B.J. (2012). Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotics on performance, caecal morphology and small intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol, 12(1): 1-12).
 
4. Barton, M.D. (2000) Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nutr. Res. Rev., 13: 279-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/095442200108729106
PMid:19087443
 
5. FAO. (2001) Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of powder milk and live lactic acid bacteria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Expert Consultation Report Cordoba/Argentina. p1-34.
 
6. Sekhon, B.S. and Jairath, S. (2010) Prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics: An overview. J. Pharm. Educ. Res., 1(2): 13-36.
 
7. Ivanovic, S., Baltic, M., Popov-Raljic, J., Pisinov, B., Maslic-Strizak, D., Stojanovic, Z., and Pavlovic, I. (2012) The effect of different probiotics on broiler meat quality. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 6(5): 937-943.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJMR-11-870
 
8. Singh, R.P. (2012) Present status and prospects of egg and poultry processing in india. XXIX annual conference and national symposium of Indian poultry science association (IPSACON-2012) on commercial and rural poultry production: Novel concepts and strategies to meet growing demand and changing consumers needs. 5th-7th December at Hyderabad. p111-115.
 
9. Sharma, N. (2007) Effect of supplementation of enzymes on growth performance in commercial broilers. A Thesis Submitted to Anand Agricultural University. p49.
 
10. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1995) Statistical Methods. 8th ed. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
 
11. Anjum, M.I. Khan, A.G. Azim, A. and Afzal, M. (2005) Effect of dietary supplementation of multi-strain probiotic on broiler growth performance. Pak. Vet. J., 25(1): 25-29.
 
12. Bozkurt, M., Kucukayilmaz, K., Catli, A.U. and Cinar, M. (2009) The effect of single or combined dietary supplementation of prebiotics, organic acid and probiotics on performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 39(3): 197-205.
 
13. Abdel-Raheem, M. and Abd-Allah, M.S. (2011) The effect of single or combined dietary supplementation of mannan oligosacharide and probiotics on performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 10(11): 854-862.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.854.862
 
14. Sojoudi, M.R., Dadashbeiki, M. and Bouyeh, M. (2012) Effect of different levels of prebiotics TechnoMos on carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res., 2(7): 6778-6794.
 
15. Mohamed, M.A., Hassan, H.M.A. and El-Barkouky, E.M.A. (2008) Effect of mannan oligosaccharide on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. J. Agric. Soc. Sci., 4(1): 13-17.
 
16. Toghyani, M., Toghyani, M. and Tabeidian, S.A. (2011) Effect of probiotic and prebiotic as antibiotic growth promoter substitutions on productive and carcass traits of broiler chicks. Int. Conf. Food Eng. Biotechnol., 9: 82-86.
 
17. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Bohm, J. (2009) Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 88: 49-55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244
PMid:19096056
 
18. Dizaji, B.R. Hejazi, S. and Zakeri, A. (2012) Effects of dietary supplementations of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and acidifiers on growth performance and organs weights of broiler chicken. Eur. J. Exp. Biol., 2(6): 2125-2129.
 
19. Swain, B.K., Naik, P.K., Chakurkar, E.B. and Singh, N.P. (2012) Effect of combined supplementation of probiotic and yeast on growth, carcass characteristics and economics of production in broiler chickens. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol, 12: 103-110.
 
20. Ashayerizadeh, A., Dabiri, N., Mirzadeh, K. and Ghorbani, M.R. (2011) Effects of dietary inclusion of several biological feed additives on growth response of broiler chickens. J. Cell Anim. Biol., 5(4): 61-65.
 
21. Ramlah, A.H. and Tan, C.K. (1995) Effects of probiotic supplementation on broiler performance. Perlanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci., 18(2): 109-112.
 
22. Munj, C.P., Ranade, A.S., Desai, D.N., Patil, M.B., Avari, P.E., Patil, U.M. and Metakari, D.V. (2010) Synergistic effects of feed additives on performance of broilers. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 45(3): 292-296.