Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published online:
16-02-2015)
9.
Chromosomal profile of indigenous pig (Sus scrofa) -
P. Guru Vishnu, B. Punyakumari, B. Ekambaram,
M. Gnana Prakash and B. V. Subramanyam
Veterinary World, 8(2): 183-186
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2015.183-186
P. Guru
Vishnu:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sri Venkateswara
Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India;
vishnugenetics@gmail.com
B.
Punyakumari:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sri Venkateswara
Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India;
punya67@yahoo.co.in
B.
Ekambaram:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sri Venkateswara
Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India;
dr_ekambaram@rediffmail.com
M.
Gnana Prakash:
Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sri Venkateswara
Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India;
manthanigp@yahoo.com
B. V.
Subramanyam: Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sri
Venkateswara Veterinary University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh,
India;
manyamboddu@gmail.com
Received:
11-10-2014, Revised:
05-01-2015, Accepted:
11-01-2015, Published online:
16-02-2015
Corresponding author:
P.
Guru Vishnu, e-mail: vishnugenetics@gmail.com
Citation:
Guruvishnu P,
Punyakumari B, Ekambaram B, Prakash MG, Subramanyam BV (2015)
Chromosomal profile of indigenous pig (Sus scrofa),
Veterinary World, 8(2) 183-186.
Abstract
Aim:
The objective of this study was to investigate the chromosomal
profile of indigenous pigs by computing morphometric measurements.
Materials and Methods: A cytogenetic study was carried out in
60 indigenous pigs to analyze the chromosomal profile by employing
the short term peripheral blood lymphocyte culture technique.
Results: The modal chromosome number (2n) in indigenous pigs
was found to be 38 and a fundamental number of 64 as in the
exotic. First chromosome was the longest pair, and thirteenth pair
was the second largest while Y-chromosome was the smallest in the
karyotype of the pig. The mean relative length, arm ratio,
centromeric indices and morphological indices of chromosomes
varied from 1.99±0.01 to 11.23±0.09, 1.04±0.05 to 2.95±0.02,
0.51±0.14 to 0.75±0.09 and 2.08±0.07 to 8.08±0.15%, respectively
in indigenous pigs. Sex had no significant effect (p>0.05) on all
the morphometric measurements studied.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that among autosomes
first five pairs were sub metacentric, next two pairs were sub
telocentric (6-7), subsequent five pairs were metacentric (8-12)
and remaining six pairs were telocentric (13-18), while both
allosomes were metacentric. The chromosomal number, morphology and
various morphometric measurements of the chromosomes of the
indigenous pigs were almost similar to those established breeds
reported in the literature.
Keywords: chromosomal profile, indigenous
pigs, idiogram, morphometric measurements.
References
1. 19th Livestock Census – 2012 All India Report. Department
of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry Of
Agriculture, Government of India. Available from: http://www.dahd.nic.in/dahd/statistics/animal-husbandry-statistics.aspx.
[Last accessed on 17-06-2014]. |
|
2. BAHS (Basic Animal Husbandry Stastistics). 2013 Department
of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India. Available from: http://www.dahd.nic.in/dahd/statistics/animal-husbandry-statistics.aspx.
[Last accessed on 23-09-2014]. |
|
3. Karma, N., Durga, D.J., Jaime, G. and Chris, M. (2010)
Farming and biodiversity of indigenous pigs in Nepal. Roy.
Soc. Ch. Biodiversity, 11(3-4): 26-33. |
|
4. Mpofu, I. and Makuza S.M.M. (2003) In: Shonhiwa, A.,
editor. Pig Production Science and Technology. 1st ed. Upfront
Publishing, UK. |
|
5. Drucker, A.G. and Anderson, S. (2004) Economic analysis of
animal genetic resources and the use of rural appraisal
methods: Lessons from southeast Mexico. Int. J. Agric.
Sustain., 2: 77-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2004.9684569 |
|
6. Zanga, J., Chimonyo, M., Kanengoni, A., Dzama, K. and
Mukaratirwa, S. (2003) A Comparison of the susceptibility of
growing mukota and large white pigs to infection with ascaris
suum. Vet. Res. Commun., 27(8): 653-660.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027320428646
PMid:14672454 |
|
7. Iannuzzi, L. (2009) Cytogenetics in animal production.
Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 6: 23-28. |
|
8. Moorehead, P.S., Nowell, P.C., Mellman, W.J., Batthips,
D.M. and Hungerford, D.A. (1960) Chromosome preparation of
leucocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp. Cell.
Res., 20: 613-616.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(60)90138-5 |
|
9. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994) Statistical
Methods. 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA. |
|
10. Hornak, M., Oracova, E., Hulinska, P., Urbankova, L. and
Rubes, J. (2012) Aneuploidy detection in pigs using
comparative genomic hybridization: From the oocytes to
blastocysts. Plos One., 7(1): e30335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030335
PMid:22291937 PMCid:PMC3264574 |
|
11. Sahoo, N.R., Banik, S., Pankaj, P.K. and Sahoo, M. (2013)
Cytogenetic architecture of Niang megha pig. Indian Vet. J.,
90(12): 59-61. |
|
12. Guruvishnu, P., Punyakumari, B., Ekambaram, B. and Sarjan,
R.K. (2013) Cytogenetic studies in crossbred pigs. Indian J.
Anim. Res., 48(1): 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.1.001 |
|
13. Peretti, V., Ciotola, F., Dario, C., Albarella, S., Meo,
D.G.P., Perucatti, A., Barbieri, V. and Ianuzzi, I. (2006)
Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) for the first time in
Casertana pig breed. Hereditas, 143(2006): 113-116.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01937.x
PMid:17362343 |
|
14. Albayrak, I. and Inci, S. (2007). The karyotype of the
wild boar Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 in Turkey. Turk. J. Zool.,
31: 65-68. |
|
15. Arslan, A. and Albayrak, I. (2009) C-Banded karyotype and
nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) of Wild Boar, Sus scrofa
from anatolia. Turk. J. Biol., 33: 29-33. |
|
16. Ziolkowska, A. and Bogdzinsk, M. (2008) Chromosomal
polymorphism in the Polish Landrace and polish large white
swine breeds. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 9: 677-682. |
|
17. Apparao, K.B.C., Bhat, P.P. and Bhat, P.N. (1993)
Chromosome banding patterns of Indian domestic pig. Indian J.
Anim. Sci., 63: 849-856. |
|
18. Daniel, H., Thiagarajan, V. and Kandasamy, N. (1993)
Karyotype analysis on G-band chromosomes of Desi Pigs, Large
White York Shire and their crosses. Indian Vet. J., 70:
531-535. |
|
19. Kanadkhedkar, H.L., Nehete, S.B., Suryawanshi, A.R. and
Umrikar, U.D. (2006) Chromosomal study of desi pig. J. Bombay
Vet. Coll., 14: 78-79. |
|
20. Palegar, M.S., Govindaiah, M.G., Nagaraja, C.S. and
Jayashankar, M.R. (1995) Chromosome studies on exotic and
local non-descriptive pigs. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 65: 799-800. |
|
21. Quach, T.A., Villagomez, D.A., Coppola, G., Pinton, A.,
Hart, E.J., Reyes, E.R., Basrur, P.K. and King, W.A. (2009) A
cytogenetic study of breeding boars in Canada. Cytogenet.
Genome Res., 126(3): 271-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000251964
PMid:20068298 |
|
22. Oluwole, O.O. and Omitogun, O.G. (2009) Cytogenetic
characterization of Nigerian indigenous pig. Afr. J.
Biotechnol., 8: 4696-4701. |
|