Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
R esearch
(Published online:
28-10-2015)
15. Conventional and
fluorescent based semen quality assessment in Karan Fries bulls
- A. Panmei, A. K. Gupta, P. R. Shivahre,
M. Bhakat and A. Upadhyay
Veterinary World, 8(10): 1243-1246
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2015.1243-1246
A.
Panmei:
Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,
Haryana, India; panmei.achun07@gmail.com
A.
K. Gupta:
Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,
Haryana, India; guptaak2009@gmail.com
P.
R. Shivahre:
Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,
Haryana, India; drpr06@gmail.com
M.
Bhakat:
Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,
Haryana, India; bhakat.mukesh@gmail.com
A.
Upadhyay: Division of Dairy Cattle Breeding, Indian Council of
Agricultural Research, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,
Haryana, India;
upadhyay.arpan@gmail.com
Received: 30-05-2015, Revised: 10-09-2015, Accepted:
18-09-2015, Published online: 28-10-2015
Corresponding author:
A. Panmei, e-mail: panmei.achun07@gmail.com
Citation:
Panmei A, Gupta AK,
Shivahre PR, Bhakat M, Upadhyay A (2015) Conventional and
fluorescent based semen quality assessment in Karan Fries bulls,
Veterinary World 8(10): 1243-1246.
Abstract
Aim:
The present study was carried out on semen ejaculates of 15
Karan Fries (KF) bulls maintained at Artificial Breeding Research
Centre, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India with an
objective to evaluate the relationship between the conventional
and fluorescent based semen quality analysis of the bulls.
Materials and Methods: A total of 96 ejaculates were collected
from 15 KF (Holstein Friesian [HF] crossbred) bulls. Semen were
evaluated for color, volume, mass activity (MA) and percentage of
individual motility (IM), sperm concentration, percent live
spermatozoa, hypo-osmotic swelling test and acrosome integrity,
chromatin integrity, sperm viability, and membrane integrity. Data
were analyzed using SPSS software package for descriptive
analysis. The correlation between rankings of sires based on
conventional and fluorescent semen parameters were calculated by
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Results: The average ejaculates volume (ml), sperm
concentration (10 6/ml), MA, IM (%), live
(%), morphological abnormalities (%), host (%), acrosome integrity
(%), chromomycin A3 (CMA3) (%), SYBR-PI (%), and fluorescent
isothiocyanate-peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA) (%) were 4.57±0.36,
1162.98±97.93, 2.95±0.09, 60.8±1.22, 71.41±2.10, 9.31±1.15,
65.5±1.81, 86.6±1.59, 3.53±0.43, 65.39±2.23 and 74.47±2.53,
respectively. Rank correlations were found to be significant for
SYBR-PI and FITC-PNA with most of the parameters evaluated by
conventional methods. Overall, among conventional criteria, IM
revealed ranking of bulls almost similar to that of fluorescent
criteria.
Conclusion: Overview of our results
indicated that, among conventional criteria, MA and IM revealed
ranking of bulls almost similar to that of fluorescent criteria.
Keywords: conventional method, fluorescent
technique, Karan Fries, semen quality.
References
1. Samplaski, M.K., Agarwal, A., Sharma, R. and Sabanegh, E.
(2010) New generation of diagnostic tests for infertility:
Review of specialized semen tests. Int. J. Urol., 17: 839-847.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02619.x
PMid:20887631 |
|
2. Moazzam, A., Choudhary, M.N., Muhammad, I., Sarwat, J. and
Ijaz, A. (2015) From basic to contemporary semen analysis:
Limitations and variability. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 25: 328-336. |
|
3. Mocé, E. and Graham, J.K. (2008) In vitro evaluation of
sperm quality. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 105: 104-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.11.016
PMid:18178345 |
|
4. Brito, L.F.C. (2010) A multi-stud study on variation of
semen evaluation. In: Proceeding National Association Animal
Breeders 23rd Technical Conference on Artificial Insemination
and Reproduction, Columbia, MO. p112-115. |
|
5. Zubair, M., Lodhi, L.A., Ahmad, E. and Ghulam, M. (2013)
Hypo-osmotic swelling test as screening for evaluation of
semen of bull. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 1: 124-128. |
|
6. Santos, J.R., Amaral, A., Sousa, A.P., Rodrigues, A.S.,
Martins, L., Baptista, M., Mota, P.C., Tavares, R., Amaral, S.
and Gamboa, S. (2007) Probing the structure and function of
mammalian sperm using optical and fluorescence microscopy.
Modern Research and Educational Topics in Microscopy.
Méndez-Vilas, A., Díaz, J., editors. Formatex, Badajoz, Spain.
p394-402. |
|
7. Farah, O.I., Cuiling, L., Jiaojiao, W. and Huiping, Z.H.
(2015) Use of fluorescent dyes for readily recognizing sperm
damage. J. Reprod. Infertil., 14: 120-125. |
|
8. Bianchi, P.G., Manicardi, G.C., Bizzaro, D., Bianch, U. and
Sakkas, D. (1993) Effect of deoxyribonucleic acid
protamination on fluorochrome staining and in-situ nick
translation of maurine and human mature spermatozoa. Biol.
Reprod., 49: 1083-1088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod49.5.1083
PMid:8286574 |
|
9. Januskauskas, A., Gil, J., Soderquist, L., Haard, M.G.,
Haard, M.C., Johannisson, A. and Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (1999)
Effect of cooling rates on post-thaw sperm motility, membrane
integrity, capacitation status and fertility of dairy bull
semen used for artificial insemination in Sweden.
Theriogenology, 52: 641-658.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00159-4 |
|
10. Roth, T.L., Weiss, R.B., Buff, J.L., Bush, L.M., Wildt,
D.E. and Bush, M. (1998) Heterologous in vitro fertilization
and sperm capacitation in an endangered African antelope, the
scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah). Biol. Reprod., 58:
475-482.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.2.475
PMid:9475404 |
|
11. Becker, W.A. (1986) Manual of Procedures in Quantitative
Genetics. Publication of Washington State University, Pullman,
U.S.A. |
|
12. Swiger, L.A., Harvey, W.R., Everson, D.D. and Gregory,
K.E. (1964) The variance of intraclass correlation involving
groups with one observation. Biometrics, 20: 818-826.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2528131 |
|
13. Lasley, J.F. (1972) Genetics of Livestock Improvement. 2nd
ed. Prentice Hall, Englewolf Cliffs, NG, USA. p429.
PMid:4119108 |
|
14. Ulfina, G. and Raina, V.S. (2002) Effect of age and
scrotal circumference on seminal attributes in dairy bulls.
Indian J. Anim. Sci., 72: 1114-1116. |
|
15. Bhakat, M. (2008) Studies on low grade ejaculates for
augmenting semen quality and preservability in dairy bulls.
Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal, Haryana. |
|
16. Mathur, A.K., Tyagi, S., Mukherjee, S. and Singh, S.P.
(2002) Semen quality attributes in Ffrieswal bulls. Indian J.
Anim. Sci., 72: 59-60. |
|
17. Panwar, P.S. and Nagpaul, P.K. (1994) Behavioural
temperament and libido studies in Murrah buffalo bulls.
Proceedings of 4th World Buffalo Congress. Sao Paulo, Brazil.
27-30 June, Vol. 3. p600-602. |
|
18. Garge, U.K. and Pandit, R.K. (1983) Studies on some
seminal attributes in relation to fertility in crossbred
bulls. Indian. J. Anim. Reprod., 4: 26-29. |
|
19. Singh, C.M. and Pangawkar, G.R. (1990) Studies on semen
characteristics of exotic and crossbred bulls spermatozoa.
Indian J. Anim. Res., 11(2): 92-95. |
|
20. Raja, C.K.S.V. and Rao, A.R. (1983) semen characteristics
of brown swiss cross bred bulls. Indian Vet. J., 60: 23-28. |
|
21. Sharma, M.L., Mohan, G. and Sahni, K.L. (1990) A
comparative study of acrosomal morphology of crossbred and
Holstein Friesian bull semen. Indian J. Anim. Res., 11(2):
96-99. |
|
22. Rajak, S. (2012) Testicular fine needle aspiration (FNA)
cytology to evaluate fertility in crossbred (KF) bulls.
M.V.Sc. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal, Haryana. |
|
23. Singh, S. (2014) Selected management interventions and
biostimulation to augment libido and sperm production in
Sahiwal bulls. M.V.Sc. Thesis, NDRI Deemed University, Karnal,
Haryana. |
|
24. Vijetha, B.T. (2011) Pedigree analysis of semen quality
and its relationship with fertility in Karan Fries crossbred
bulls. M.V.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute.
Karnal, Haryana, India. |
|
25. Sandeep, K. (2010) Methylation profile of H19 gene in
relation to fertility status of crossbred bulls. M.V.Sc
Thesis, NDRI (Deemed University), Karnal, Haryana, India. |
|
26. Boujenane, I. and Boussaq, K. (2013) Environmental effects
and repeatability estimates for sperm production and semen
quality of holstein bulls. Arch. Tierzucht., 56(98): 971-979. |
|
27. Taylor, J.F., Bean, B., Marshall, L.C.E. and Sullivan,
J.J. (1985) Genetic and environmental components of semen
production traits of artificial insemination holstein bulls.
J. Dairy Sci., 68: 2703-2722.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81155-3 |
|
28. Mathevon, M., Buhr, M.M. and Dekkers, J.C. (1998)
Environmental, management, and genetic factors affecting semen
production in Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci., 81: 3321-3330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75898-9 |
|
29. Karoui, S., Díaz, D., Serrano, M., Cue, R., Celorrio, I.
and Carabano, M.J. (2011) Time trends, environmental factors
and genetic basis of semen traits collected in Holstein bulls
under commercial conditions. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 124: 28-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.008
PMid:21377297 |
|
30. Giwercman, A., Richthoff, J., Hjollund, H., Bonde, J.P.,
Jepson, K., Frohm, B. and Spano, M. (2003) Correlation between
sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters.
Fertil. Steril., 80: 1404-1412.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02212-X |
|
31. Sills, E.S., Fryman, J., Perloe M., Michels, K. and
Tucker, M. (2004) Chromatin fluorescence characteristic and
standard semen analysis parameters: Correlations observed in
andrology testing among 136 males referred for infertility
evaluation. Obstet. Gynecol., 24: 74-77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443610310001620369 |
|