Open Access
R esearch
(Published
online: 12-01-2016)
6.
Effect of different culture systems on the
production of foot and mouth disease trivalent vaccine -
Amr Ismail Hassan
Veterinary World, 9(1): 32-37
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2016.32-37
Amr Ismail Hassan:
Department of Foot and Mouth Disease, Veterinary Serum and
Vaccine Research Institute, Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt; amr_hassanin@hotmail.com
Received: 01.09.2015, Revised: 23.11.2015, Accepted: 04.12.2015,
Published online: 12-01-2016
Citation:
Hassan AI (2016) Effect of different culture systems on the
production of foot and mouth disease trivalent vaccine,
Veterinary World, 9(1):
32-37.
Abstract
Aim:
This study aims to determine the effect of the stationary rawx,
roller, and the suspension cell culture systems on the total
virus yield infectivity and antigenicity.
Materials and Methods:
Three serotypes of foot and mouth disease virus (FMDV) (serotype
A, O and SAT-2) were inoculated separately into baby hamster
kidney-21 cell line in rawx, roller, and suspension cultivation
systems using multiplicity of infection (1:100). Samples were
taken from the total virus yield from each system at 15, 18, 21,
and 24 h post-inoculation. Testing the total virus yield
infectivity through virus titration and antigenicity through
estimation of complement fixing titer and 146S content and
evaluation of the potency of the vaccine prepared from the
different cultivation systems were done.
Results:
The results showed that the FMDV titer of serotype A, O, and
SAT-2 obtained from the roller cultivation system showed the
highest level followed by suspension cultivation system then the
rawx cultivation system. The FMDV titer showed its highest level
at 21 h post-inoculation in all the cultivation systems and then
decline at 24 h post-inoculation. The antigenicity reached its
highest value content at 18 h post-inoculation either by
complement fixation test or by quantifying the 146S intact
virion. Montanide ISA 206 oil inactivated trivalent vaccines
were prepared from the tested serotypes (A Iran O5. O Panasia
and SAT-2/EGY/2012) harvested at 18 h post-inoculation from the
3 culture systems. The results of tracing the antibody response
showed that the mean antibody response from the roller
cultivation system start its protective antibody titer earlier
at 2 weeks post-vaccination (WPV) than the vaccine prepared from
the other two cultivation system and the immune protection
period lasts longer for 36 WPV for the roller cultivation system
vaccine than the other two cultivation systems.
Conclusion:
The best cultivation system used for the production of FMD
vaccine regarding its highest infectivity and antigenicity is
the roller system.
Keywords:
baby hamster kidney-21 cell culture, foot and mouth disease
virus, monolayer tissue culture cells, suspension
tissue culture cells.
References
1. Depa, P.M., Dimri, U., Sharma, M.C. and Tiwari, R. (2012)
Update on epidemiology and control of foot and mouth disease
- A menace to international trade and global animal
enterprise. Vet. World, 5(11): 694-704.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.693-703 |
|
2. Longjam, N., Deb, R., Sarmah, A.K., Tayo, T., Awachat,
V.B. and Saxena, V.K. (2011) A brief review on diagnosis of
foot and- mouth disease of livestock: Conventional to
molecular tools. Vet. Med. Int., 2011: 905768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/905768 |
|
3. Rowland, R. (2003) Foot and Mouth Disease. Elsevier
Australia. p1. |
|
4. Grubman, MJ, and Baxt, B. (2004) Foot-and-mouth disease.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 17: 465-493.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.2.465-493.2004
PMid:15084510 PMCid:PMC387408 |
|
5. Guzman, E, Taylor, G, Charleson, B, Skinner, M.A. and
Ellis, S.A. (2008) An MHC restricted CD8+ T-cell response is
induced in cattle by Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV)
infection and also following vaccination with inactivated
FMDV. J. Genviro1., 89: 667-675. |
|
6. Aidaros, H.A. (2002) Regional status and approaches to
control and eradication of FMD in the Middle East and North
Africa. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot., 21(3): 451-458. |
|
7. Farag, M.A., Aggour, M.A. and Daoud, A.M (2005) ELISA as
a rapid method for detecting the correlation between the
field isolates of Foot and Mouth Disease and the current
used vaccine strain in Egypt. Vet. Med. J. Giza. Vol.,
53(4): 949-955. |
|
8. Parida, S. (2009) Vaccination against foot‑and‑mouth
disease virus: Strategies and effectiveness Expert Rev.
Vaccines, 8(3): 347-365.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14760584.8.3.347 |
|
9. Abd El- Rahman, A.O., Farag, M.A., El- Kilany, S., Ali,
S.M. and Yazed, M.A. (2006) Isolation and Identification of
Serotype O of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus from Imported
Bulls and its Correlation to the Current used Vaccine Strain
O1/3/1993. Proceeding 3rd International Conference
Veterinary Research Division, NRC, Cairo, Egypt. p91-100. |
|
10. Abd El-Aty, S.M., Hiam, M.F., Hind, M.D., El-Sayed,
E.I., Wael Mossad, G., Rizk, S.A., Abu-El-Naga, H., Mohamed,
A.A., El-Kreem, A.A. and Farouk, E.M. (2013) Isolation and
molecular characterization of foot and mouth disease SAT2
virus during outbreak 2012 in Egypt. J. Vet. Adv., 3(2):
60-68.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jva.20130219104353 |
|
11. Gamal, W.M., Soliman, E.M.M. and El-Manzalawy, M.A.
(2014) Tracing the antibody mediated acquired immunity by
foot and mouth disease and rift valley fever combined
vaccine in pregnant ewes and their lambs. Vet. World, 7(11):
922-928.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.922-928 |
|
12. Abd El-Karim, A.S., Ebeid, M.H.B., Ibrahim, F.K. and
Azab, A.M. (2011) Field application of bivalent inactivated
foot and mouth disease vaccine adjuvanted by ISA 206. 4th
Sci. Conf., Al-Kasr 25-28 May, 2011 Benha Vet. Med.
J.,Special Issue[1]:82-87. |
|
13. Neeta, L, Rajib, D., Sarmah, A.K., Tilling, T., Awachat,
V.B. and Saxena, V.K. (2011) A brief review on diagnosis of
foot-and-mouth disease of livestock: Conventional to
molecular tools. Vet. Med. Int., 2011: Article ID 905768.
DOI:10.4061/2011/905768.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/905768 |
|
14. Huang, X., Yong, L., Hui, F. and Congyi, Z. (2011)
Establishment of persistent infection with foot and mouth
disease virus in BHK-21 cells. Virol. J., 8: 169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-8-169
PMid:21492421 PMCid:PMC3097150 |
|
15. Guo, H.C., Jin, Y., Han, S.C., Sun, S.Q., Wei, Y.Q.,
Liu, X.J., Feng, X., Liu, D.X., Liu, X.T. (2015)
Quantitative proteomic analysis of BHK-21 cells infected
with foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1. PLoS One,
10(7): e0132384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132384 |
|
16. Daoud, H.M., Ibrahim, E.E., El-Din, W.M.G., Hassanin,
A.I.H. (2013) Preparation of foot and mouth disease
trivalent vaccine type A, O, SAT2 and determination of the
Guinea pig protective dose 50 (GPPD). Vet. World, 6(11):
844-851.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2013.844-851 |
|
17. Shabana, W. (2014) Preparation of combined oil vaccine
against foot and mouth disease and rift valley fever in
sheep. Ph.D. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo
University. |
|
18. Alhaji, S. (2011) A modified arithmetical method of Reed
and Muench for determination of a relatively ideal median
lethal dose LD50. Afr. J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 5(12):
1543-1546.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJPP11.393 |
|
19. Health Protection Agency. (2009) Complement Fixation
Tests. Issue no: 3 Issue date 11.12.09 Issued by: Standards
Unit, Department for Evaluations, Standards and Training. 1
- 23 . |
|
20. Bartelling, A.S.J., Van Maanan, C., Yadin, H. and
Anemaet, D.A.J. (1990) A foot and mouth disease vaccine
bank; purified inactivated antigen stored at ultra-low
temperatures for the rapid preparation of double oil
emulsion vaccines. European Commission for Control of Foot
and Mouth Disease. Session of Research Group of the Standing
Technical Committee, Lindholm. p172-177. |
|
21. Gamil, M.A. (2010) Studies on the immune response of
calves vaccinated inactivated bivalent FMD virus vaccine
type O/1 and A/Egypt 2006. MVSC in Veterinary Science
(Virology). Benha University.
PMCid:PMC2880377 |
|
22. Ferreira, M.E.V. 1976. Microtitre neutralization test
for the study of FMD antibodies. Bol. Centro Pan Americano
de Fiebre aftosa 21: 22-23. |
|
23. Ali, S.M., Ismail, A.H., Soliman, E.M. and Mostafa, H.A.
(2013) Studies on growth kinetics of the FMDV serotype SAT-2
Egyptian strain in cell culture. J. Vet. Adv., 3(2): 92-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jva.20130221053913 |
|
24. Akram, Q., Muhammad, K., Rabbani, M., Nazir J., Nawaz,
M., Hanif, K. and Shakoor, Z. (2013) Augmentation of
biological titer of foot and mouth disease virus in in vitro
cultures. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 23(3): 771-774. |
|
25. Altaf, I., Saddique, M., Irshad, M., Khan, M.Z., Anjum,
A.A. and Kamran, M. (2012) Antibody response of rabbits to
combined hemorrhagic septicemia and foot and mouth disease
virus vaccine. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 22(2): 501-504. |
|
26. Khawaja, R.M., Muhammad, K., Shahzad, W., Hussain, I.,
Choudhry, Z.I., Awan, F.N., Bukhari, A., Altaf, I. and
Hanif, A. (2009) Isolation, adaptation and sero-typing of
local strains of foot and mouth disease virus Pakistan. J.
Zool., 9: 173-177. |
|
27. Salivac, I., Srček, V.G., Radošević, K., Kmetič, I. and
Kniewald, Z. (2006) Aujeszky's disease virus production in
disposable bioreactor. J. Bio sci., 31: 363-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02704109 |
|
28. Ali, S.M. (2009) Kinetic studies on the sensitivity and
susceptibility of BHK21 cells to replication of FMD Serotype
(A) Isolated from Egypt Outbreak 2006. 6th Science
Conference of Mansoura, Faculty of Mansoura. p929-938. |
|
29. OIE. (2013) OIE/FAO Foot-and-Mouth Disease Reference
Laboratory Network, Annual Report 2013. |
|