Veterinary World

     Open access and peer reviewed journal  

ISSN (Online): 2231-0916

 

Home l Editorial board l Instructions for authors l Reviewer guideline l Open access policy l Archives l FAQ


Open Access


Research (Published online: 01-09-2016)

1. Impacts of self- and cross-sucking on cattle health and performance - Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud, Fatma Ali Mahmoud and Adel Elsayed Ahmed

Veterinary World, 9(9): 922-928

 

 

   doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.922-928

 

 

Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud: Department of Animal Behavior and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt; motamed71111@gmail.com

Fatma Ali Mahmoud: Department of Animal Behavior and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt; ftm_abushanief@yahoo.com

Adel Elsayed Ahmed: Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt; adelqena@lycos.com

 

Received: 20-04-2016, Accepted: 26-07-2016, Published online: 01-09-2016

 

Corresponding author: Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud, e-mail: motamed71111@gmail.com


Citation: Mahmoud ME, Mahmoud FA, Ahmed AE (2016) Impacts of self- and cross-sucking on cattle health and performance, Veterinary World, 9(9): 922-928.



Background: Improvement of dairy farms economics requires intensification, automatic milking, and artificial rearing methods. The ability to express normal behavior is one of the five freedoms to achieve animal welfare, whereas the display of abnormal behaviors is considered as an indicator of poor welfare. Cross-sucking is defined as sucking any body parts of pen-mate calves, whereas inter-sucking in cows is defined as sucking the udder or udder area. Previous studies showed that self- and cross-sucking during the calf-hood period could be a causal factor of milk sucking in adulthood.

Aim: To investigate the effects of cross-sucking among calves and inter-sucking in cows on animal health status and performance.

Materials and Methods: Gathering information from customized questionnaires, the study of the breeding records, recording of self- and cross-sucking behaviors, and health status of calves till weaning, and dairy cows before milking were performed in two governmental farms under the same managemental conditions in Sohag and Qena governorates.

Results: Cross-sucking appeared in calves at the 2nd week of age followed by abscesses at ears and navels that were observed within cross-sucker calves. Milk sucking was higher in primiparous than multiparous cows during the second lactation period, as primiparous cows start to suck mostly around the 4th month of milking. Mastitis and elongation of the front teats were observed in sucker cows. Suffered animals had body condition scoring 3.5 or less. Interestingly, most of the cows displaying self-sucking were sucking another cow and were experienced self- or cross-sucking in their calf-hood. The use of pronged nose-rings was ineffective in preventing milk sucking and all cows were ultimately culled at the end of the season.

Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate the health problems of abnormal oral behaviors in terms of developed ears and navels abscesses in cross-sucker calves, and mastitis and teat deformities in milk-sucker cows. Furthermore, indexes that lead to oral satisfaction should be taken in priorities of farm managers to effectively reduce or prevent crosssucking in calves. Culling of cows and heifers suffering from sucking would be the ultimate uneconomic alternative in case of persistent suckers.

Keywords: animal welfare, culling, inter-sucking in cows, self-sucking in calves, teat deformity.



1. Johnsen, J.F., de Passille, A.M., Mejdell, C.M., Bře, K.E., Grřndahl, A.M., Beaver, A., Rushen, J. and Weary, D.M. (2015) The effect of nursing on the cow - Calf bond. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 163; 50-57.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.12.003
 
2. Khan, M.A., Weary, D.M. and von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2011) Invited review: Effects of milk ration on solid feed intake, weaning, and performance in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 94: 1071-1081.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3733
 
3. Soberon, F., Raffrenato, E., Everett, R.W. and Van Amburgh, M.E. (2012) Preweaning milk replacer intake and effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 783-793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4391
PMid:22281343
 
4. David, I., Bouvier, F., Ricard, E., Ruesche, J. and Weisbecker, J.L. (2014) Feeding behaviour of artificially reared Romane lambs. Animal, 8: 982-990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000603
PMid:24666599 PMCid:PMC4023569
 
5. Wagner, K., Barth, K., Palme, R., Futschik, A. and Waiblinger, S. (2012) Integration into the dairy cow herd: Long-term effects of mother contact during the first twelve weeks of life. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 141: 117-129.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.011
 
6. Webb, L.E., van Reenen, C.G., Berends, H., Engel, B., de Boer, I.J., Gerrits, W.J. and Bokkers, E.A. (2015) The role of solid feed amount and composition and of milk replacer supply in veal calf welfare. J. Dairy Sci., 98: 5467-5481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8547
PMid:26004839
 
7. Pempek, J.A., Eastridge, M.L., Botheras, N.A., Croney, C.C. and Yoho, W.S.B. (2011) Effects of alternative housing and feeding systems on the behavior and performance of dairy heifer calves. Prof. Anim. Sci., 29: 278-287.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30234-5
 
8. Keil, N.M. and Langhans, W. (2001) Development of intersucking among dairy calves around weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 295-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00207-0
 
9. Leruste, H., Brscic, M., Cozzi, G., Kemp, B., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Lensink, B.J., Bokkers, E.A. and van Reenen, C.G. (2014) Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on commercial farms. J. Dairy Sci., 97: 7021-7030.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7917
PMid:25218744
 
10. Roth, B.A., Barth, K., Gygax, L. and Hillmann, E. (2009) Influence of artificial vs. mother-bonded rearing on sucking behavior, health and weight gain in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 119: 143-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.03.004
 
11. Roth, B.A., Hillmann, E., Stauffacher, M. and Keil, N.M. (2008) Improved weaning reduces cross-sucking and may improve weight gain in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 111: 251-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.06.007
 
12. de Passillé, A.M. and Rushen, J. (2012) Adjusting the weaning age of calves fed by automated feeders according to individual intakes of solid feed. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 5292-5298.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5521
PMid:22916934
 
13. Fröberg, S., Aspegren-Güldorff, A., Olsson, I., Marin, B., Berg, C., Hernández, C., Galina, C.S., Lidfors, L. and Svennersten-Sjaunja, K. (2007) Effect of restricted suckling on milk yield, milk composition and udder health in cows and behaviour and weight gain in calves, in dual-purpose cattle in the tropics. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 39: 71-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4418-0
PMid:17941489
 
14. Appleby, M.C., Weary, D.M. and Chua, B. (2001) Performance and feeding behaviour of calves on ad libitum milk from artificial teats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 74: 191-201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00171-X
 
15. de Passillé, A.M. (2001) Sucking motivation and related problems in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 175-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00108-3
 
16. Keil, N.M., Audigé, L. and Langhans, W. (2000) Factors associated with intersucking in Swiss dairy heifers. Prev. Vet. Med., 45: 305-323.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00127-6
 
17. Svensson, C. and Jensen, M.B. (2007) Short communication: Identification of diseased calves by use of data from automatic milk feeders. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 994-997.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)71584-9
 
18. Gransworthy, P.C. (2005) In: Calf and Heifer Rearing - Principles of rearing modern Dairy Heifer from Calve to Calving. Modern Calves and Heifers: Challenges for Rearing Systems. 1st ed. Ch. 1. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, England. p1-33.
 
19. Mitlöhner, F.M., Morrow-Tesch, J.L., Wilson, S.C., Dailey, J.W. and McGlone, J.J. (2001) Behavioral sampling techniques for feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 79: 1189-1193.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/2001.7951189x
PMid:11374538
 
20. Mahmoud, M.E. and Salman, D. (2015) Low body condition scoring as a detrimental factor to reproductive performance and behavior in dairy cattle and Seidi buffaloes. Assiut Vet. Med. J., 61: 112-118.
 
21. Food Safety Inspection Service, (FSIS). (2013) Using Dentition to Age Cattle. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ofo/tsc/bse_information.htm. Accessed on 01-03-2013.
 
22. Georg, H. and Ude, G. (2007) Reducing cross - Sucking of group housed calves by an environmental enriched building design. 9. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau. Beitrag archiviert unter. Available from: http://www.orgprints. org/view/projects/wissenschaftstagung-2007.html. Last accessed on 14-06-2016.
 
23. Jung, L. and Ledfors, L. (2001) The effect of mount of milk, milk flaw and the access to a rubber teat on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 72: 201-213.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00110-1
 
24. de Paula Vieira, A., Guesdon, V., De Passillé, A.M. and Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2008) Behavioral indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 180-189.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.03.006
 
25. Nielsen, P.P., Jensen, M.B. and Ledfors, L. (2008) Milk allowance and weaning method affect the use of computer controlled milk feeder and development of cross-sucking in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109: 223-237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.015
 
26. Meale, S.J., Leal, L.N., Martín-Tereso, J. and Steelea, M.A. (2015) Delayed weaning of Holstein bull calves fed an elevated plane of nutrition impacts feed intake, growth and potential markers of gastrointestinal development. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 209: 268-273.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.008
 
27. Keil, N.M., Audigé, L. and Langhans, W. (2001) Is intersucking in dairy cows the continuation of a habit developed in early life? J. Dairy Sci., 84: 140-146.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74462-1
 
28. Jensen, M.B. (2006) Computer - Controlled milk feeding of group housed calves: The effect of milk allowance and weaning type. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 201-206.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72084-7
 
29. Rushen, J., de Passillé, A.N. and Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2008) The welfare of cattle. Introduction: What is Animal Welfare? Springer, Dordrecht, Neitherland. p1-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6558-3
 
30. Vaughan, A., Miguel-Pacheco, G.G., de Passillé, A.M. and Rushen, J. (2016) Reciprocated cross sucking between dairy calves after weaning off milk does not appear to negatively affect udder health or production. J. Dairy Sci., 99: 5596-5603.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9504
PMid:27085413
 
31. De Vliegher, S., Fox, L.K., Piepers, S., McDougall, S. and Barkema, H.W. (2012) Invited review: Mastitis in dairy heifers: Nature of the disease, potential impact, prevention, and control. J. Dairy Sci., 95: 1025-1040.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4074
 
32. Piepers, S., Peeters, K., Opsomer, G., Barkema, H.W., Frankena, K. and De Vliegher, S. (2011) Pathogen group specific risk factors at herd, heifer and quarter levels for intramammary infections in early lactating dairy heifers. Prev. Vet. Med., 99: 91-101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.010
PMid:21411160
 
33. Loberg, J. and Lidfors, L. (2001) Effect of stage of lactation and breed on how dairy cows accept foster calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 74: 97-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00157-5
 
34. Greenland, S. and Finkle, W.D. (1995) A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am. J. Epidemiol., 142: 1255-1264.
PMid:7503045
 
35. Dechow, C.D., Rogers, G.W. and Clay, J.S. (2002) Heritability and correlations among body condition score loss, body condition score, production and reproductive performance. J. Dairy Sci., 85: 3062-3070.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74393-2
 
36. Kadarmideen, H.N. and Wegmann, S. (2003) Genetic parameters for body condition score and its relationship with type and production traits in Swiss Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3685-3693.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73974-5
 
37. Gautam, G. and Nakao, T. (2009) Prevalence of urovagina and its effects on reproductive performance in Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 71: 1451-1461.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.12.027
PMid:19286246