Open Access
Research
(Published
online: 30-09-2016)
21.
Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain
reaction assay with microscopy for detection of asymptomatic
carrier state of theileriosis in a herd of crossbred cattle -
Gaurav Charaya, N. K. Rakha, Sushila Maan, Aman Kumar, Tarun
Kumar and Ricky Jhambh
Veterinary World, 9(9): 1039-1042
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2016.1039-1042
Gaurav Charaya:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of
Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India;
gcharaya9@gmail.com
N. K. Rakha:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of
Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India; drrakha@gmail.com
Sushila Maan:
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University
of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India;
sushilamaan105@gmail.com
Aman Kumar:
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Lala Lajpat Rai University
of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India;
aman.abt@luvas.edu.in
Tarun Kumar:
Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Lala Lajpat Rai University
of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India;
tarunvet@gmail.com
Ricky Jhambh:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Lala Lajpat Rai University of
Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India;
jhambricky@gmail.com
Received: 05-05-2016, Accepted: 18-08-2016, Published online:
30-09-2016
Corresponding author:
N. K. Rakha, e-mail: drrakha@gmail.com
Citation:
Charaya G, Rakha NK, Maan S, Kumar A, Kumar T, Jhambh R (2016)
Comparative evaluation of polymerase chain reaction assay with
microscopy for detection of asymptomatic carrier state of
theileriosis in a herd of crossbred cattle,
Veterinary World, 9(9):
1039-1042.
Abstract
Aim:
This study aims to develop and to standardize a polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) assay that will diagnose clinical as well as
carrier state of the disease and to compare the results with
conventional microscopy technique.
Materials and Methods:
A herd of crossbred cattle with the previous history of
theileriosis in village Lahli, district Rohtak, Haryana, was
selected for this study. A total of 29 blood samples were
collected randomly from cows including five clinically ill
cattle. Blood smears from all animals and lymph node biopsy
smears from animal with swollen lymph nodes were examined
microscopically after conventional Giemsa staining. Phenol
chloroform isoamyl alcohol method was used for extracting DNA
from blood. Previously published primers targeting
cytochrome b
gene sequence of
Theileria annulata
were used in the PCR assay that was standardized to use in the
laboratory.
Results:
Out of 29 samples tested,18 (62.06%) were found positive for
theileriosis by PCR assay, whereas only 10 (34.48%) samples were
detected positive by conventional microscopic technique using
Giemsa staining method.
Conclusions:
On the basis results of comparative studies, it can be concluded
that PCR assay is a more sensitive than microscopic examination
for detection of theileriosis. This can be attributed to the
ability of PCR assay to detect small amounts of genomic DNA of
T. annulata
or low parasitemia in cows. Therefore, PCR assay can serve as a
more sensitive tool to detect
Theileria
for detection of theileriosis even in asymptomatic carrier
cattle which is important for the implementation of successful
control programs.
Keywords:
Carrier state,
cytochrome b,
Giemsa staining, polymerase chain reaction assay, theileriosis,
Theileria annulata.
References
1. Cacci, S., Camma, C., Onuma, M. andSeverini, C. (2000)
The b-tubulin gene of Babesia and Theileria parasites is an
informative marker for species discrimination. Int.
J.Parasitol., 30:1181-1185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00105-3 |
|
2. Kirvar, E., Ilhan, T., Katzer, F., Hooshmand-Rad, E.,
Zweygarth, C., Gerstenberg, P.P. and Brown, C.G. (2000)
Detection of Theileria annulata in cattle and vector ticks
by PCR. Parasitology, 120(3): 245-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182099005466 |
|
3. Friedhoff, K. and Bose, R. (1994) Recent developments in
diagnostics of some tick-borne diseases. In: Uilenberg, G.,
Permin, A.and Hansen, J.W., editors.Use of Applicable
Biotechnological Methods for Diagnosing Haemoparasites.
Proceedings of the Expert Consultation, Merida, Mexico, Food
and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO),
Rome, Italy.p46-57. |
|
4. Altay, K., Aydın, M.F., Dumanli, N. andAktas, M. (2008)
Molecular detection of Theileria and Babesia infections in
cattle. Vet.Parasitol., 158:295-301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.09.025
PMid:19008048 |
|
5. Benjamin, M. (1978) Outline of Veterinary Clinical
Pathology. 3rded. The Iowa State University, Press, Ames,
Iowa, U.S.A. p51-53. |
|
6. Bilgic, H.B., Karagenc, T., Shiels, B., Tait,A., Eren, H.
and Weir,W. (2010) Evaluation of cytochrome b as a sensitive
target for PCR based detection of T. annulata carrier
animals. Vet. Parasitol., 174: 341-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.025
PMid:20880635 |
|
7. Salih, D.A., Hassan, S.M. and El Hussein, A.M. (2007)
Comparisons among two serological tests and microscopic
examination for the detection of Theileria annulata cattle
in Northern Sudan. Prev. Vet. Med., 81:323-326.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.05.008
PMid:17590458 |
|
8. Shayan, P. and Rahbari, S. (2005) Simultaneous
differentiation between Theileria sp. and Babesia sp. on
stained blood smear using PCR. Parasitol. Res., 97:281-286.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-005-1434-3
PMid:16007464 |
|
9. Noaman, V. (2014) Comparison of molecular and microscopic
technique for detection of Theileria spp. in carrier cattle.
J. Parasit. Dis., 38(1): 64-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-012-0196-y
PMid:24505180 PMCid:PMC3909596 |
|
10. Nayel, M., El-Dakhly, K.M., Aboulaila, M., Elsify, A.,
Hassan, H., Ibrahim, E., Salama, A. and Yanai, T. (2012) The
use of different diagnostic tools for Babesia and Theileria
parasites in cattle in Menoufia, Egypt. Parasitol. Res.,
111(3):1019-1024.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-2926-6
PMid:22543747 |
|
11. Hoghooghi-Rad, N., Ghaemi, P. and Shayan, P. (2011)
Detection of native carrier cattle infected with Theileria
annulata by seminested PCR and smear method in Golestan
province of Iran. World Appl. Sci. J., 12(3): 317-323. |
|
12. Chauhan, H.C., Patel, B.K., Bhagat, A.G., Patel, M.V.,
Patel, S.I., Raval, S.H., Panchasara, H.H., Shrimali, M.D.,
Patel, A.C. and Chandel, B.S. (2015) Comparison of molecular
and microscopic technique for detection of Theileria
annulata from the field cases of cattle.Vet. World, 8(11):
1370-1374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.1370-1374
PMid:27047045 PMCid:PMC4774753 |
|
13. Roy, K.C., Ray, D., Bansal, G.C. and Singh, R.K. (2000)
Detection of Theileria annulata carrier cattle by PCR.
Indian J. Exp. Biol., 38: 283-284.
PMid:10927875 |
|
14. Kohli, S., Atheya, U.K. and Thapliyal, A. (2014)
Prevalence of theileriosis in cross-bred cattle: Its
detection through blood smear examination and polymerase
chain reaction in Dehradun district, Uttarakhand, India.
Vet. World, 7(3): 168-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.168-171 |
|
15. Azizi, H., Shiran, B., Farzaneh, D.A., Salehi, F. and
Taghadosi, C. (2008) Detection of Theileria annulata by PCR
and its comparison with smear method in native carrier cows.
Biotechnology, 79(3): 574-577.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.574.577 |
|