Open Access
Research
(Published
online: 03-09-2016)
3.
Semi-quantitative digital analysis of
polymerase chain reactionelectrophoresis gel: Potential
applications in low-income veterinary laboratories -
John F. Antiabong, Mafora G. Ngoepe and Adakole S. Abechi
Veterinary World, 9(9): 935-939
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2016.935-939
John F. Antiabong:
Department of Molecular Microbiology, School of Biological
Sciences, Flinders University SA, Bedford Park, 5042, Australia;
Department of Applied Biotechnology, National Veterinary
Research Institute, Nigeria; negribj@hotmail.com
Mafora G. Ngoepe:
Onderstepoort Biological Products, Onderstepoort, Pretoria,
0110, South Africa; ngoepeg@yahoo.com
Adakole S. Abechi:
Department of Applied Biotechnology, National Veterinary
Research Institute, Nigeria; jamush2002@yahoo.com
Received: 09-03-2016, Accepted: 28-07-2016, Published online:
03-09-2016
Corresponding author:
John F. Antiabong, e-mail: negribj@hotmail.com
Citation:
Antiabong JF, Ngoepe MG, Abechi AS (2016) Semiquantitative
digital analysis of polymerase chain reaction-electrophoresis
gel: Potential applications in low-income veterinary
laboratories,
Veterinary World, 9(9):
935-939.
Abstract
Aim:
The interpretation of conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
assay results is often limited to either positive or negative
(non-detectable). The more robust quantitative PCR (qPCR) method
is mostly reserved for quantitation studies and not a readily
accessible technology in laboratories across developing nations.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a semi-quantitative method
for conventional PCR amplicons using digital image analysis of
electrophoretic gel. The potential applications are also
discussed.
Materials and Methods:
This study describes standard conditions for the digital image
analysis of PCR amplicons using the freely available ImageJ
software and confirmed using the qPCR assay.
Results and Conclusion:
Comparison of ImageJ analysis of PCR-electrophoresis gel and
qPCR methods showed similar trends in the
Fusobacterium necrophorum
DNA concentration associated with healthy and periodontal
disease infected wallabies (p≤0.03). Based on these empirical
data, this study adds descriptive attributes (“more” or “less”)
to the interpretation of conventional PCR results. The potential
applications in low-income veterinary laboratories are
suggested, and guidelines for the adoption of the method are
also highlighted.
Keywords:
applications, digital image analysis, ImageJ software,
polymerase chain reaction-electrophoresis, polymerase chain
reaction amplicon, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
References
1. Nietfeld, J.C. (2010) Field necropsy techniques and
proper specimen submission for investigation of emerging
infectious diseases of food animals. Vet. Clin. North Am.
Food Anim. Pract., 26(1): 1-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.10.005
PMid:20117539 |
|
2. Van Guilder, H.D., Vrana, K.E. and Freeman, W.M. (2008)
Twenty-five years of quantitative PCR for gene expression
analysis. Biotechniques, 44: 619.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2144/000112776
PMid:18474036 |
|
3. Abramoff, M.D., Magelhaes, P.J. and Ram, S.J. (2004)
Image processing with Image. J. Biophotonics Int., 11:
36-42. |
|
4. Berchtold, C.M., Wu, Z.H., Huang, T.T. and Miyamoto, S.
(2007) Calcium-dependent regulation of NEMO nuclear export
in response to genotoxic stimuli. Mol. Cell. Biol., 27:
497-509.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01772-06
PMid:17074802 PMCid:PMC1800799 |
|
5. Rai, T., Mosoian, A. and Resh, M.D. (2010) Annexin 2 is
not required for human immunodeficiency virus Type 1
particle production but plays a cell type-dependent role in
regulating infectivity. J. Virol., 84: 9783-9792.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01584-09
PMid:20631122 PMCid:PMC2937750 |
|
6. Antiabong, J.F., Boardman, W., Smith, I., Brown, M.H.,
Ball, A.S. and Goodman, A.E. (2013) A molecular survey of a
captive wallaby population for periodontopathogens and the
co-incidence of Fusobacterium necrophorum subspecies
necrophorum with periodontal diseases. Vet. Microbiol., 63:
335-343.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.012
PMid:23428381 |
|
7. Schmittgen, T.D., Zakrajsek, B.A., Mills, A.G., Gorn, V.,
Singer, M.J. and Reed, M.W. (2000) Quantitative reverse
transcription–polymerase chain reaction to study mRNA decay:
Comparison of endpoint and real-time methods. Anal. Biochem.,
285: 194-204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.2000.4753 |
|
8. Cai, H.Y., Caswell, J.L. and Prescott, J. (2014)
Nonculture molecular techniques for diagnosis of bacterial
disease in animals a diagnostic laboratory perspective. Vet.
Pathol. Online, 51(2): 341-350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300985813511132
PMid:24569613 |
|
9. Sardelli, A.D. (1993) The plateau effect: Understanding
PCR limitations. Amplif. Forum PCR Users, 9: 1-5. |
|
10. McPherson, M.J., Hames, B.D. and Taylor, G.R. (1995) PCR:
A Practical Approach. IRL Press, Oxford. p1-22. |
|
11. Pfaffl, M.W. (2004) In: Bustin, S.A., editor. A-Z of
Quantitative PCR. International University Line, La Jolla.
p89-113. |
|