|  | 
              
  
              
              Open Access  
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access 
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, 
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly 
cited. 
 
              
              
              Research (Published 
online :  27-10-2013) 
18. Development of molecular tools to differentiate 
Indian wild pig (Sus scrofa cristatus) meat from exotic and local domestic pig 
meat - Kajal Kumar Jadav, Avadh Bihari Shrivastav and Nidhi Rajput 
              Veterinary World, 6(11): 919-922 
  
              
              doi: 
              10.14202/vetworld.2013.919-922 
                
              
              
          
 
              Abstract 
 
              Aim: Identification of wild 
              pig and domestic pig is essential to prevent illegal poaching of 
              wild pig and to implement Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. 
              PCR-RFLP was used to differentiate Wild pig (Sus scrofa cristatus) 
              from Domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica) meat. Materials and Methods: DNA was isolated from meat samples 
              of both the sub species and a fragment of Cytochrome b gene was 
              amplified using universal primers and the PCR products were 
              subjected to restriction digestion.
 Results: All the known samples of each of the sub-species 
              amplified 474 bp fragment successfully using b1 and b2 primers. To 
              differentiate between wild and domestic pig meat, restriction 
              digestion of the PCR products was carried out to produce 
              characteristic PCR-RFLP patterns for each species. StuI digestion 
              yielded a RFLP pattern which distinguished the closely related sub 
              species. The alignment of sequences of Wild pigs with sequences of 
              local domestic pig, European wild pig and exotic breeds revealed 7 
              intra-species polymorphic sites within Cytochrome b gene fragment.
 Conclusion: This study showed that The PCR-RFLP is a simple 
              and very effective tool for differentiating the samples of both 
              the sub species and could prove to be a useful tool in forensic 
              identification of wild pig and domestic pig.
 Keywords: cytochrome b gene, domestic pig, Indian wild pig, 
              PCR-RFLP
 
 
              References 
 
                
                  | 1. Gupta, S.K., Kumar, A., Hussain, S.A., Vipin and Singh, L. 
                  (2013) Cytochrome b basesd genetic differentiation of Indian 
                  wild pig (Sus scrofa cristatus) and domestic pig (Sus scrofa 
                  domestica) and its use in wildlife forensics, Sci. Justice, 
                  53:220-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2012.09.005
 PMid:23601732
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 2. Ilhak, I.O. and Ali A. (2007) Identification of meat 
                  species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, Turk. J. 
                  Vet. Anim. Sci., 31: 159-163. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 3. Guha, S. and Kashyap, V. K. (2005) Development of novel 
                  heminested PCR assays based on mitochondrial 16s rRNA gene for 
                  identification of seven pecora species, BMC Genet., 6:42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-6-42
 PMid:16095528 PMCid:PMC1199593
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 4. Saini, M., Das, D.K., Dhara, A., Swarup, D., Sharma, A.K. 
                  and Gupta, P.K. (2008) A PCR-RFLP tool for differentiating 
                  cattle, buffalo and nilgai, Indian J. Anim. Sci., 78: 652-654. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 5. Rajput, N., Shrivastav, A.B., Parmer, S.N.S., Ranjan, R., 
                  Singh, S. and Joseph, E. (2013) Characterization of 12S rRNA 
                  gene for meat identification of common wild and domestic small 
                  herbivores as an aid to wildlife forensic, Vet. World, 6: 
                  254-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2013.254-259
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 6. Koh, M.C., Lim, C.H., Chua, S.B., Chew, S.T. and Phang, 
                  S.T.W. (1998) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) finger 
                  printing for identification of red meat animal species, Meat 
                  Sci., 48:275-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00104-6
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 7. Dooley, J. J., Paine, K.E. and Garrett, S.D. (2004) 
                  Detection of meat species using TaqMan real-time PCR assays, 
                  Meat Sci., 68:431-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.04.010
 PMid:22062411
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 8. Colombo, F., Marchisio, E., Pizzini, A. and Cantoni, C. 
                  (2002) Identification of the goose species (Anser anser) in 
                  Italian "Mortara" salami by DNA sequencing and a polymerase 
                  chain reaction with an original primer pair, Meat Sci., 61: 
                  291-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00195-4
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 9. Sawyer, J., Wood, C., Shanahan, D., Gout, S. and McDowell, 
                  D. (2003) Real-time PCR for quantitative meat species testing, 
                  Food Control, 14:579-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00148-2
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 10. Hwang, D.F., Jen, H.C. and Hsieh, Y.W. (2004) Applying DNA 
                  techniques to the identification of the species of dressed 
                  toasted eel products, J. Agr. Food Chem., 52: 5972- 5977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf034525x
 PMid:15366851
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 11. Wolf, C., Rentsch, J. and Hubner, P. (1999) PCR-FRLP 
                  analysis of mitochondrial DNA: A reliable method for species 
                  identification, J. Agr. Food Chem., 47: 1350-1355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf9808426
 PMid:10563979
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 12. Sanches, A., Tokumoto, P.M., Peres, W.A.M., Nunes, F.L., 
                  Gotardi, M.S.T., Carvalho, C.S., Pelizzon, C., Godoi, T.G. and 
                  Galetti, M. (2012) Illegal hunting cases detected with 
                  molecular forensics in Brazil. Investig. Genet., 3(1):17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-3-17
 PMid:22863070 PMCid:PMC3488531
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 13. Kocher, T.D., Thomas, W.K., Mayer, A., Edwards, S.V., 
                  Paabo, S.,Villablanca, F. X. and Wilson, A.C. (1989) Dynamics 
                  of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and 
                  sequencing of conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 
                  86: 6196-6200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196
 PMid:2762322 PMCid:PMC297804
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 14. Sambrook, J. and Russell, D.W. (2001) Molecular cloning: a 
                  molecular approach laboratory manual. 3rd edition. New York: 
                  Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 15. Alaeddini, R., Walsh, S.J. and Abbas, A. (2010) Forensic 
                  implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA-a review, 
                  Forensic Sci. Int. Genet., 4:148-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.09.007
 PMid:20215026
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 16. Meganathan, P.R., Dubey, B. and Haque, I. (2009) Molecular 
                  identification of Indian crocodile species: PCR- RFLP method 
                  for forensic authentification, J. Forensic Sci., 54:1042-1045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01119.x
 PMid:19686389
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 17. Shi-Yi, C., Yong-Gang, Y. and Yi-Ping, L. (2012) Species 
                  identification of ten common farm animals based on 
                  mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene polymorphisms, Anim. Biotechnol., 
                  23:213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2012.696568
 PMid:22870876
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 18. Borgo, R., Souty Grosset, C., Bouchon, D. and Gamot, L. 
                  (1996) PCR RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA for 
                  identification of snail, J. Food Sci., 61:1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14712.x
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 19. Matsunga, T., Shibata, K., Yamada, J., Shinmura, Y. and 
                  Chikuni, K. (1998) Identification of meat species based on 
                  different 18S ribosomal genes, J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci., 45: 
                  719-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.3136/nskkk.45.719
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 20. Rane, P.P and Barve, S.S. (2011) Standardization and 
                  Optimization of mtDNA isolation and molecular genetic analysis 
                  of D-loop region in animal natural fibres, Int. J. of Zool. 
                  Res., 7:190-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijzr.2011.190.200
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 21. Jon, H.W., Carol, S., Tsang, F., Chris, A.R. and Adrian, 
                  C.S. (2004) An extremely sensitive species-specific ARMs PCR 
                  test for the presence of tiger bone DNA, Forensic Sci. Int., 
                  140:139-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2003.11.018
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 22. Samaraweera, M., Himali, S.M.C., Zeng, S.C., Jianlin, H. 
                  and Silva, P. (2011) Development of molecular tools to 
                  differentiate Sri Lankan wild Boar (Sus scrofa affinis) meat 
                  from exotic and village pig (Sus scrofa domestica) meat, Trop. 
                  Agr. Res., 23: 11 – 20. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 23. Tobe, S.S., Kitchener, A.C. and Linacre, A.M.T. (2010) 
                  Reconstructing mammalian phylogenetics: a detailed comparison 
                  of the cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit I 
                  mitochondrial gene, PloS One 11:e14156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014156
 PMid:21152400 PMCid:PMC2994770
 |  |  |