|  | 
              
  
              
              Open Access  
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access 
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, 
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly 
cited. 
 
              
              
              Research (Published 
online :  14-08-2013) 
12. Synergistic effect of non starch polysaccharide 
enzymes, synbiotics and phytase on performance, nutrient utilization and gut 
health in broilers fed with sub-optimal energy diets - J. Narasimha, 
D. Nagalakshmi, Y. Ramana Reddy and S. T. Viroji RaoVeterinary World, 6(10): 754-760
 
                
              doi: 
              10.14202/vetworld.2013.754-760 
                
              
              
          
 
              Abstract 
 Aim:
              In view of the ban on antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs), an 
              attempt was made to explore the possibility of harnessing 
              synergistic effect of non starch polysaccharide (NSP) enzymes, 
              synbiotics and phytase on performance, nutrient retention, gut 
              health and histology of broilers fed with corn-soybean meal based 
              low calorie diets. 
              Materials and Methods: A total of 150 a day-old broiler chicks 
              were weighed, wing banded and randomly distributed into five 
              experimental groups, six replicates per group and five birds per 
              replicate and raised in electrically heated battery brooders. 
              Evaluated the synergistic effect of the NSP enzymes, synbiotics 
              and phytase alone or in combination, supplemented to cornsoybean 
              meal based broiler diet, low in energy concentration (Basal diet 
              (BD)) (-225 kcal lower metabolizable energy than standard diet 
              (SD), on performance, nutrient retention, carcass traits, gut 
              conditions and cost per kg live weight gain. 
              Results: The body weight gain in broiler chicks fed with BD 
              supplemented with NSP enzymes, synbiotics and phytase was 
              significantly (P<0.01) higher. Supplementation of NSP enzymes, 
              synbiotics and phytase alone or in combination had significant 
              effect on feed intake. Synergistic effect of NSP enzyme, 
              synbiotics and phytase was observed on overall feed conversion 
              ratio (1.86), which improved (P<0.05) in comparison to BD (2.06) 
              and SD (2.02), respectively. The supplementation of NSP enzymes, 
              synbiotics and phytase to BD improved (P<0.05) utilization of 
              organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), nitrogen free extract (NFE), 
              gross energy (GE), phosphorus and the tibia ash compared to BD, 
              whereas no effect on retention of DM and CF was observed. 
              Intestinal viscosity and E. coli count significantly 
              (P<0.01) reduced with addition of NSP enzymes, synbiotics plus 
              phytase or combination of all. The supplementation of NSP enzymes, 
              synbiotics plus phytase had no effect on intestinal histology. The 
              cost of feeding was lower (P<0.01) in BD. Addition of these feed 
              additives to BD did not increase the feeding cost and was 
              comparable to unsupplemented ones and lower (P<0.01) than SD. 
              Similarly, the feed cost per kg 
              live weight gain during various phases of broiler production was 
              reduced (P<0.01) due to supplementation of all the feed additives 
              compared to SD and BD. 
              Conclusions: It can be concluded from the above experiment 
              that supplementing sub-optimal energy diets with NSP enzymes along 
              with synbiotics and phytase improved body weight gain, FCR, 
              nutrient retention, tibia ash and reduced the cost of production 
              considerably. 
              Keywords: gut health, histology, live weight gain, NSP 
              enzymes, nutrient retention, synbiotics, phytase, 
 
              References 
 
                
                  | 1. Grashorn, M.A. (2010) Use of phytobiotics in broiler 
                  nutrition – an alternative to in feed antibiotics? Journal of 
                  Animal and Feed Sciences 19:338–347. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 2. Panda, K., Rama Rao, S.V. and Raju, M.V.L.N. (2006) Natural 
                  growth promoters have potential in poultry feeding systems. 
                  Feed Technology 10 (8): 23-25. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 3. Maiorka, A., Santin, A. M. E., Borges, S. A., Opalinski, M. 
                  and Silva, A. V. F. (2004) Evaluation of a mix of fumaric, 
                  lactic, citric and ascorbic acids on starter diets of 
                  broilers. Archives of Veterinary Science 9: 31-37. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 4. Lokhande, D. Y., Ranade, A. S., Desai, D. N., Patil, M. B., 
                  Avari, P. E., Patwardhan, D. S., Adsul A. P. and Gaikwad, P. 
                  G. (2005) Comparative evaluation of prebiotic, probiotic and 
                  acidifier in broiler diets. Journal of Bombay Veterinary 
                  College 13 (1-2): 17-19. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 5. National Research Council. (1994) Nutrient Requirements of 
                  Poultry. 9th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 6. AOAC. (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of 
                  official Analytical chemists 18th Edition (Virginia, USA, 
                  Association of official Analytical chemists). |  
                  |  |  
                  | 7. Clayden, E. C. (1962) Practical section cutting and 
                  staining. 4th Edition, J and Churchil limited. pages: 137-139. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 8. Culling, C. F. A. (1957) Hand Book of Histopathological 
                  Techniques. London Butterworth and company (publisher) Ltd. 
                  pages: 421-427 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 9. Duncan, D. D. (1955) Multiple range and multiple ' F' test, 
                  Biometrics 11:1-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3001478
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 10. Owens, B., Tucker, L., Collins, M. A. and Mc Cracken K. J. 
                  (2008) Effects of different feed additives alone or in 
                  combination on broiler performance, gut microflora and ileal 
                  histology. British Poultry Science 49 (2): 202-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660802004890
 PMid:18409095
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 11. Bozkurt, M. K., Kucukylmaz, A., Çatl, U. and Çnar, M. 
                  (2009) The effect of single or combined dietary supplemen- 
                  tation of prebiotics, organic acid and probiotics on 
                  performance and slaughter characteristics of broilers. South 
                  African Journal of Animal Science 39 (3): 45 – 52. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 12. Markovic, R., Sefera, D., Krstic, M. and Petrujkic, B. 
                  (2009) Effect of different growth promoters on broiler 
                  performance and gut morphology. Archives of Veterinary 
                  Medicine 41: 163-169. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 13. Jung, S. J., Houde, R., Baurhoo, B., Zhao, X, and Lee, B. 
                  H. (2008) Effects of galacto-oligosaccharides and a 
                  Bifidobacteria lactis-based probiotic strain on the growth 
                  performance and faecal microflora of broiler chickens. Poultry 
                  Science 87: 1694–1699. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00489
 PMid:18753434
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 14. Cowieson, A. J. and Adeola, O. (2005) Carbohydrases, 
                  protease and phytase have an additive beneficial effect in 
                  nutritionally marginal diets for broiler chicks. Poultry 
                  Science 84: 1860-1867. PMid:16479942
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 15. Olukosi, O. A., Cowieson, A. J. and Adeola, O. (2007) Age- 
                  related influence of a cocktail of xylanase, amylase and 
                  protease or phytase individually or in combination in broiles. 
                  Poultry Science 86: 77-86. PMid:17179419
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 16. Woyengo, T. A., Slominski, B. A. and Jones, R. O. (2010) 
                  Growth performance and nutrient utilization of broiler 
                  chickens fed diets supplemented with phytase alone or in 
                  combination with citric acid and multi carbohydrase. Poultry 
                  Science 89: 2221-2229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00832
 PMid:20852113
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 17. Mountzouris, K. C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, 
                  A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G. and Fegeros, K. (2010) Effects 
                  of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth 
                  performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglo- bulins 
                  and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science 89: 58-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00308
 PMid:20008803
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 18. Khan, S. H., Sardar, R. and Siddique, B. (2006) Influence 
                  of enzymes on performance of broilers fed sunflower-corn based 
                  diets. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 26 (3): 109-114. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 19. Francesch, M. and Geraert, P. A. (2009) Enzyme complex 
                  containing carbohydrases and phytase improves growth 
                  performance and bone mineralization of broilers fed reduced 
                  nutrient corn-soybean based diets. Poultry Science 88: 1915- 
                  1924. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00073
 PMid:19687277
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 20. Munj, C. P., Ranade, A. S., Desai, D. N., Avari. P. E., 
                  Patil, U. M. and Metakari, D. V. (2010) Studies on synergistic 
                  effects of certain common feed additives on carcass quality, 
                  intestinal pH and gut microflora in broilers. Indian Journal 
                  Animal Nutrition 27 (1): 93-95. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 21. Farran, M.T., Barbour, G.W., Usayron, N. N., Darwish, 
                  A.H., Hasan H. Matchhlals, H. H., Hruby, M. and Askarian, V. 
                  M. (2010) Performance and carcass quality of broiler chickens 
                  fed a corn-soybean meal diet containing graded barley levels 
                  without or with enzymes. Journal of Poultry Science 47: 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.009003
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 22. Nadeem, M. A., Anjum, M. I., Khan, A. G. and Azim, A. 
                  (2005) Effect of dietary supplementation of non-starch 
                  polysaccharide degrading enzymes on growth performance of 
                  broiler chicks. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 25 (4): 183- 188. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 23. Wageha, A., Ghareeb, K. and Bohm, J. (2008) Intestinal 
                  structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supple- 
                  mented with a symbiotic containing Enterococcus faecium and 
                  oligosaccharides. International Journal of Molecular Science 9 
                  (11): 2205-2216. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms9112205
 PMid:19330069 PMCid:PMC2635618
 |  |  |