|
Open Access
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly
cited.
Research
(Published
online : 14-07-2013)
19.
A study on bovine brucellosis in an organized dairy farm
- V. Bhanu Rekha, L. Gunaseelan, A. Subramanian and Gowry Yale
Vet World. 2013; 6(9):
681-685
doi:
10.14202/vetworld.2013.681-685
Abstract
Aim:
To assess the status of bovine brucellosis in an organized dairy
with a past history of Brucella abortions and where
Brucella control measures including test and removal,
calf-hood vaccination (already present adult animals were not
vaccinated), use of semen obtained from a screened bull and
general hygienic measures helps in the control of brucellosis in
the farm have been implemented for the past four years.
Materials and Methods: A total of 195 samples including 89
blood samples, 89 serum samples and 17 milk samples were collected
and analysed by isolation and identification, Polymerase chain
Reaction (PCR), Milk Ring Test (MRT), Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT),
Standard Tube Agglutination Test (STAT) and Enzyme Linked
Immnuno-Sorbent assay (ELISA).
Results:
On analysis, all the 89 blood and 17 milk samples turned out to be
negative for culture and PCR. MRT and ELISA tests on all the 17
milk samples and STAT on all the 89 serum samples were also
negative. The percent positives for Brucella antibodies in
serum samples were 4.5 and 6.7 by RBPT and ELISA, respectively. Of
the 17 vaccinated animals, 14 were negative by all the Brucella
antigen and antibody diagnostic tests employed. Amongst the
three vaccinated animals, one animal was positive by RBPT and
I-ELISA and, two animals were positive by I-ELISA alone. On the
other hand, of the 72 non-vaccinated animals, 65 were negative by
all the diagnostic tests employed, three animals were positive by
RBPT and 4 animals were positive by I-ELISA.
Conclusion: The results of our study indicated that a
combination of RBPT and I-ELISA can be successfully used for
screening for brucellosis when the prevalence is low.
Implementation of control measures including test and removal of
the affected, calf-hood vaccination, use of semen obtained from a
screened bull and general hygienic measures help in the control of
brucellosis in the farm.
Keywords: bovine brucellosis, control programmes, diagnostic
tests, ELISA, organized dairy farm, RBPT
References
1. Smits, H.L. and Manzoor Kadri, S. (2005) Brucellosis in
India: a deceptive infectous disease. Indian J Med Res.
122:375-384.
PMid:16456249 |
|
2. Mantur, B.G. and Amaranth, S.K. (2008). Brucellosis in
India-a review. J. Biosci., 33(4):539-547.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-008-0072-1
PMid:19208979 |
|
3. Godfroid, J., Saegerman, C. and Wellemansa, V. (2002) How
to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when
aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of
brucellosis testing. Vet Microbiol., 90:461–477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00230-4 |
|
4. Mu-oz, P., Marín, C.M. and Monreal, D. (2004) Efficacy of
several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of cattle
brucellosis in the presence of false positive serological
results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Clin Diagn Lab
Immunol., 12:141–151. |
|
5. OIE: Bovine brucellosis (2011) In Manual of Diagnostic
Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. World Organization
for Animal Health, Paris, France;1-35. |
|
6. Mantur, B. and Mangalgi, S.S. (2004) Evaluation of
conventional Castaneda and lysis centrifugation blood culture
techniques for diagnosis of human brucellosis.
J.Clin.Microbiol., 42(9): 4327-4328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.9.4327-4328.2004
PMid:15365036 PMCid:PMC516314 |
|
7. Sulima, M. (2009) Serological and molecular detection of
Brucella infection in cattle. M.V.Sc. thesis submitted to
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Tamil
Nadu, India. |
|
8. Bricker, B.J and Hailing S.M (1994) Differentiation of
Brucella abortus bv. 1,2 and 4, Brucella melitensis,
Brucellaovis and Brucella suis bv 1 by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol.
32: 2660-2666.
PMid:7852552 PMCid:PMC264138 |
|
9. Glynn, M.K. and Lynn, T.V. (2008) Zoonosis update-
Brucellosis. JAVMA, 233(6):900-908.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.233.6.900
PMid:18795849 |
|
10. Hinic, V., Brodard, I., Thomann, A., Holub, M., Raymond
miserez and Abril, C. (2009) IS711 –based real-time PCR assay
as a tool for detection of Brucella spp. in wild boars and
comparison with bacterial isolation and serology. BMC
Veterinary Research, 5:22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-5-22
PMid:19602266 PMCid:PMC2719624 |
|
11. Poester, F.P., Nielsen, K., Samartino, L.E. and Yu, W.L.
(2010) Diagnosis of Brucellosis. The Open Vet. Sci. J., 4:
46-60. |
|
12. Manish, K., Puran, C., Rajesh, C., Teena, R. and Sunil, K.
(2013) Brucellosis: An updated review of the disease. Indian
Journal of Animal Sciences, 83 (1): 3–16. |
|
13. Leal-klevezas, D.S., Martinez-vazquez, I.O., Lopez-
Merino, A. and Martinez-Soriano, J.P. (1995) Single step PCR
detection of Brucella spp. from blood and milk of infected
animals. J.Clin.Microbiol., 33: 3087-3090.
PMid:8586678 PMCid:PMC228649 |
|
14. Morato, P., Queipo-Ortuno, M.I and de DIOS Colmenero, J.
(1998) Strategy for optimizing DNA amplification in a
peripheral blood PCR assay used for diagnosis in human
brucellosis. J.Clin.Microbiol., 36: 2443-2446. |
|
15. Godfroid, J., Nielsen, K. and Saegerman, C. (2010)
Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Livestock and Wildlife. Croat Med
J. 51: 296-305.Corbel, M.J. (1985) Recent advances in the
study of Brucella antigens and their serological cross-
reactions. Vet Bull., 55: 927-42. |
|
16. Corbel, M.J. (1985). Recent advances in the study of
Brucella antigens and their serological cross-reactions. Vet
Bull., 55: 927-42. |
|
17. Butler, J., Seawright, G. and McGivern, P. (1986)
Preliminary evidence for a diagnostic Immunoglobulin G1
antibody response among culturepositive cows vaccinated with
Brucella abortus strain 19 and challenge exposed with strain
2308. Am J Vet Res 47: 1258- 1264.
PMid:3089082 |
|
18. Chachra, D., Saxena, H.M., Kaur, G. and Chandra, M. (2009)
Comparitive efficacy of Rose Bengal plate test, Standard tube
agglutination test and Dot ELISA in immunological detection of
antibodies to Brucella abortus in sere. J. Bact. Res., 1(3):
030-033. |
|
19. Shafee. M., Rabbani, M., Sheikh, A., Ahmad, M. and Razzaq,
A. (2011) Prevalence of bovine Brucellosis in organized dairy
farms, using milk ELISA, in Quetta city, Balochistan,
Pakistan. Vet Med Int. Article ID : 358950. |
|
20. Trangadia, B., Rana, S.K., Mukherjee, F. and Srinivasan,
V.A. (2010) Prevalence of brucellosis and infectious bovine
rhinotracheitis in organized dairy farms in India. Trop Anim
Health Prod. 42(2):203-207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9407-7
PMid:19644761 |
|
21. Jacques, I., Olivier-Bernardin, V. and Dubray. G. (1998)
Efficay of ELISA compared to conventional tests (RBPT and CFT)
for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep.
Vet Microbiol., 64(1):61–73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(98)00250-8 |
|
22. Hunter, S.B., Bibb, W.F. and Shih, C.N. (1986) Enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay with major outer membrane proteins
of Brucella melitensis to measure immune response to Brucella
species. J Clin Microbiol., 24: 566–572.
PMid:3095364 PMCid:PMC268973 |
|
23. Kostoula, A., Bobogianni, H. and Virioni, G. (2001)
Detection of Brucella Ig G, IgM and IgA antibodies with ELISA
method in patients with Brucellosis. Clin Microbiol Infect., 7
(1): 108. |
|
24. Mai, H.M., Irons, P.C., Kabir, J. and Thompson, P.N.
(2012) A large seroprevalence survey of brucellosis in cattle
herds under diverse production systems in northern Nigeria BMC
Veterinary Research, 8:144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-144
PMid:22920578 PMCid:PMC3482151 |
|
25. Matope, G., Bhebhe, E., Muma, J.B., Oloya, J., Madekurozwa,
R.L., Lund, A. and Skjerve,E. (2011) Seroprevalence of
brucellosis and its associated risk factors in cattle from
small holder dairy farms in Zimbabwe. Trop Anim Health Prod
.43:975-982.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9794-4
PMid:21327714 |
|
|