|  | 
              
  
              
              Open Access  
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access 
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, 
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly 
cited. 
 
              
              
              Research 
(Published 
online : 22-06-2013)9.
Immunocompetence index selection of broiler chicken lines for disease resistance 
and their impact on survival rate 
- G. K. Sivaraman and Sanjeev Kumar
 
Vet World. 2013; 6(9):
  628-631 
                
              doi: 
              10.14202/vetworld.2013.628-631   
  
  
          
 
              Abstract 
 
              Aim: To isolate aerobic 
              bacterial micro flora residing in the upper respiratory tract of 
              equines used by the pilgrims and tourists in Jammu & Kashmir. Materials and Methods: 88 apparently healthy equines and 53 
              equines with respiratory tract diseases were used in this study. 
              Swab samples were collected from the upper respiratory tract of 
              equines. Isolation and identification of the bacteria was 
              conducted under aerobic conditions. Each of the sample processed 
              yielded at least one type of bacteria species.
 Results: A total of 321 bacterial isolates were recovered 
              from both groups of equines. The majority of the isolates were 
              Gram positive (84.11%) and the rest were Gram negative (15.88%). 
              Bacterial isolates identified in order of the magnitude were 
              Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus (17.44%), Micrococcus spp. 
              (9.96%), Corynebacterium spp. (9.65%), Staphylococcus intermedius 
              (9.65%), Staphylococcus aureus (8.72%), Bacillus spp. (7.16%), 
              Streptococcus pneumonia (5.60%), Staphylococcus chromogens 
              (5.60%), Streptococcus equismilis (5.29%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 
              (5.29%), Rhodococcus equi (3.73%), Escherichia coli (3.73%), 
              Klebsiella pneumoniae (3.42%), Proteus vulgaris (3.42%), and 
              Streptococcus equi subsp. equi (1.24%).
 Conclusion: The present study reveals the predominance of 
              Gram positive bacteria in both healthy and diseased animals. 
              Bacteria were recovered at a higher rate from diseased equines 
              than from apparently healthy animals. Streptococcus equi subsp. 
              zooepidemicus was mainly found to be associated with respiratory 
              tract infections.
 Keywords: bacterial flora, equines, respiratory tract, 
              Rhodococcus equi, Streptococcus equi
 
 
              References 
 
                
                  | 1. Christina, L. S., Pevzner, I. Y., He, H., Genovese, K. J., 
                  Nisbet, D. J., Kaiser, P. and Kogut M. H. (2009) Selection of 
                  broilers with improved innate immune responsiveness to reduce 
                  on-farm Infection by foodborne pathogens- A Review, Foodborne 
                  Pathogens and Disease, 6(7): 777- 783. DOI: 
                  10.1089=fpd.2009.0307.
              
                  
                  http://dx.doi.org/10.1089=fpd.2009.0307 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 2. Cheng, H. W. (2010) Breeding of tomorrow's chickens to 
                  improve well-being- A Review, Poult. Sci, 89: 805– 813. doi: 
                  10.3382/ps.2009-00361. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00361
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 3. Bolhuis, J. E., Ellen, E. D., Van Reenen, C. G., De Groot, 
                  J., Ten Napel, J., Koopmanschap, R., De Vries-Reilingh, G., 
                  Uitdehaag, K. A., Kemp, B. and Rodenburg T. B. (2009) Effects 
                  of genetic group selection against mortality on behaviour and 
                  peripheral serotonin in domestic laying hens with trimmed and 
                  intact beaks- A Review, Physiol. Behav., 97: 470– 475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.021
 PMid:19341749
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 4. Sivaraman, G. K., Kumar, S., Saxena, V.K., Singh, N.S. and 
                  Shivakumar, B. M. (2005) Genetics of immunocompetent traits in 
                  broiler chicken. Bri. Poult. Sci, 46 (2): 169- 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660500064949
 PMid:15957436
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 5. Sivaraman, G.K. and Kumar, S. (2010) Kinetics of antibody 
                  response to NDV vaccine in specialized broiler chicken lines 
                  divergently selected for immunocompetence index. J. of Appl. 
                  Ani. Res, 37: 167- 169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2010.9707118
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 6. Sudheesh, P. S., Ghabshi, A. A., Mazrooei, N. A. and Habsi, 
                  S. A. (2012) Comparative Pathogenomics of Bacteria Causing 
                  Infectious Diseases in Fish- A Review, J. of Evol. Biol, 
                  Volume 2012, Article ID 457264, 16 pages doi:10.1155 
                  /2012/457264. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 7. Wijga, S., Parmentier, H. K., Nieuwland, M. G. and 
                  Bovenhuis, H. (2009) Genetic parameters for levels of natural 
                  antibodies in chicken lines divergently selected for specific 
                  antibody response. Poult. Sci, 88(9): 1805- 1810. doi: 
                  10.3382/ps.2009-00064. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00064
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 8. Kaiser, P. (2010) Advances in avian immunology-prospects 
                  for disease. Avi. Path, 39(5): 309- 324. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 9. Zhao, X. L., Honaker, C. F. and Siegel, P. B. (2012) 
                  Phenotypic responses of chickens to long-term selection for 
                  high or low antibody titers to sheep red blood cells. Poult. 
                  Sci, 91(5): 1047- 56. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01892. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01892
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 10. Hu, Y. D., Wen, J., Zheng, M. Q., Liu, R. R., Chen, J. L., 
                  Zhu, Q. and Zhao, G.P. (2012) Correlated responses to bi- 
                  directional selection for sheep red blood cells titer in White 
                  Leghorns. J. of Ani. and Vet. Adv, 11(6): 2879- 2884. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 11. Jie, H. and Liu, Y. P. (2011) Breeding for disease 
                  resistance in poultry: Opportunities with challenges- A 
                  Review, World's Poultry Science Journal, 67 (04): 687- 696. 
                  DOI: http://dx. doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000766. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 12. Hassan, M. K., Afify, M. A. and Aly, M. M. (2004) Genetic 
                  resistance of Egyptian chickens to infectious bursal disease 
                  and Newcastle disease. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 
                  36(1): 1– 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:TROP.0000009524.47913.d4
 PMid:14979553
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 13. Hamal, K. R., Burgess, S. C., Pevzner, I. Y. and Erf, G. 
                  F. (2006) Maternal Antibody Transfer from Dams to Their Egg 
                  Yolks, Egg Whites, and Chicks in Meat Lines of Chickens. Poult. 
                  Sci, 85: 1364– 1372. PMid:16903465
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 14. Staszewski, V. and Siitari, H. (2010) Antibody injection 
                  in the egg yolk: maternal antibodies affect humoral immune 
                  response of the offspring. Functional Ecology, 24: 1333- 1341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01745.x
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 15. Sivaraman, G.K and Kumar S. (2006) Immunoresponsive- ness 
                  to IBDV vaccine in SDL broiler chicken lines divergently 
                  selected for Immunocompetence index. Ind. J. of Poult. Sci, 
                  41(1): 21- 25. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 16. Gimeno, I. M. (2008) Marek's disease vaccines: a solution 
                  for today but a worry for tomorrow? - A Review, Vaccine, 
                  26(S3): C31- C41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.04.009
 PMid:18773529
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 17. Parmentier, H. K., Walraven, M. and Nieuwland, M. G. B. 
                  (1998) Antibody response and body weights of chicken lines 
                  selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red 
                  blood cells. 1. Effect of E.coli lipopolysaccharide. Poult. 
                  Sci, 27: 248- 58. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 18. Sivaraman, G.K and Kumar, S. (2012) Genetic selection of 
                  broiler chicken lines for disease resistance and their impact 
                  on health conditions. In: XXIX Annual Conference and National 
                  Symposium of Indian Poultry Science Association, Hyderabad, 
                  India, pp.19. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 19. Kim, C. D., Lamont, S. J. and Rothschild, M. F. (1987) 
                  Genetic association of body weight and immune reponse with 
                  major histocompatibility complex in White Leghorn chicks. 
                  Poult. Sci, 66: 1258- 1263. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661258
 PMid:2825154
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 20. Ellen, E. D., Visscher. J., Van Arendonk, J. A. M. and 
                  Bijma, P. (2008) Survival of laying hens: Genetic parameters 
                  for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer 
                  lines. Poult. Sci, 87: 233- 239. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00374
 PMid:18212365
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 21. Laible, G. (2009) Enhancing livestock through genetic 
                  engineering—Recent advances and future prospects- A Review, 
                  Comp. Immunol. Microbiol., 32: 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2007.11.012
 PMid:18243310
 |  |  |