| 
              
              
              Open Access  
Copyright: The authors. This article is an open access 
article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, 
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly 
cited. 
 
              
              
              Research 
(Published 
online: 21-04-2014) 
              14. The evaluation of metabolizable 
              protein content of some indigenous feedstuffs used in ruminant 
              nutrition - Lalatendu Keshary Das, S. S. Kundu, Dinesh 
              Kumar and Chander DattVeterinary World, 7(4): 257-261
 
  
              
   
                
                
doi: 
              10.14202/vetworld.2014.257-261 
                
              
              Lalatendu Keshary Das:  Veterinary Dispensary, Kalampur, 
              Kalahandi, Odisha, India.
 
              S. S. Kundu: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National 
              Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India. 
              Dinesh Kumar: Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian 
              Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India 
              Chander Datt: Division of Dairy Cattle Nutrition, National 
              Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India. 
              Received: 01-02-2014, Revised: 20-03-2014, Accepted: 25-03-2014, 
              Published online: 21-04-2014
 
              
              Corresponding author: 
              Lalatendu Keshary Das, email: drlalatendu27@gmail.com
 
 
              Abstract 
 
              Aim: To determine the 
              metabolizable protein (MP) content of common indigenous feedstuffs 
              used in ruminant nutrition using in situ method. Materials and Methods: Nine ruminant feeds such as maize 
              grain (MG), groundnut cake (GNC), mustard oilcake (MOC), 
              cottonseed cake (CSC), deoiled rice bran (DORB), wheat bran (WB), 
              berseem fodder (BF), maize fodder (MF) and sorghum fodder (SF) 
              were included in this study. Each test feed was dried, ground and 
              chemically analysed for proximate principles (DM, CP, EE, OM, 
              Total ash), fiber fractions (NDF, ADF, cellulose, hemicellulose, 
              lignin), NDICP and ADICP. Two adult fistulated bulls were used for 
              evaluating the protein degradation characteristics of each test 
              feed using the nylon bag method. Metabolizable energy (ME) content 
              of the test feeds were predicted from their chemical composition 
              data using summative approach of NRC (2001) model. The equations 
              of AFRC (1992) were used to predict the rumen degradable protein (RDP), 
              digestible microbial protein (DMP), digestible undegraded feed 
              protein (DUP) and MP content of test feeds.
 Results: The MP content of MG, GNC, MOC, CSC, DORB, WB, BF, 
              MF and SF was found to be 95.26, 156.41, 135.21, 125.06, 101.68, 
              107.11, 136.81, 72.01 and 76.65 g/kg DM, respectively. The 
              corresponding ME (MJ/kg DM) content of the test feeds was 13.66, 
              13.12, 13.65, 10.68, 9.08, 11.56, 9.64, 8.33 and 8.03, 
              respectively. Among the test feeds, GNC contained the highest and 
              MF contained the lowest MP per kg DM.
 Conclusion: It was concluded that the degradability of 
              crude protein (CP) of the test feeds can be used in MP 
              determination and diet formulation. Feed CP content is not 
              available as such at intestinal level in ruminants as a definite 
              part of it undergoes extensive microbial degradation in rumen. The 
              pattern and extent of such degradation do influence the amount of 
              protein presented to lower digestive tract (MP) for absorption and 
              utilization in ruminants. It was also found that the MP content of 
              a feed is not constant as that of its CP content as it entirely 
              depends on the degradation characteristics in a given animal.
 Keywords: in situ method, metabolizable energy, 
              metabolizable protein, microbial protein, ruminant nutrition.
 
 
              References 
 
                
                  | 1. Burroughs, W., Trenkle, A. and Vetter, R.L. (1974) A system 
                  of protein evaluation for cattle and sheep involving 
                  metabolizable protein (amino acids) and urea fermentation 
                  potential of feedstuffs. Vet. Med. Sm. Anim. Clin. 69: 713. PMid:4494868
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 2. ARC. (1984) The nutrient requirements of ruminant 
                  livestock. Suppl. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 
                  Slough, UK. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 3. Orskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. (1979) The estimation of 
                  protein degradability in the rumen from incubation 
                  measurements weighed according to rate of passage. J. Agr. Sci. 
                  (Cambridge). 92: 499-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 4. Islam, M.R., Ishida, M., Ando, S., Nishida, T. and Yoshida, 
                  N. (2011) Whole crop rice silage: Prediction of yield and 
                  content of metabolizable energy, metabolizable protein and 
                  other nutrients for dairy cows from crop maturity and 
                  botanical fractions at harvest. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 163: 
                  222-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.11.007
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 5. Pooponpan, P., Chinrasri, O., Saenthaweesuk, S. and 
                  Chantiratikul, A. (2011) Evaluation of metabolizable protein 
                  and metabolizable energy values of Wolffia meal [Wolffia 
                  globosa (L). Wimm.] in broilers. Int J Poult Sci, 10(5): 401- 
                  403. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.401.403
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 6. Rahbarpour, A., Palangi, V., Eivagi, P. and Jalili, M. 
                  (2012) Calculation of metabolizable protein and energy of 
                  tomato pomace by nylon bags and gas production datas. Eur. J. 
                  Exp. Bio., 2(3): 822-825. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 7. Weiss, W.P., St-Pierre, N.R. and Willett, L.B. (2009) 
                  Varying type of forage, concentration of metabolizable 
                  protein, and source of carbohydrate affects nutrient 
                  digestibility and production by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 
                  92(11): 5595-5606. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2247
 PMid:19841220
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 8. Rius, A.G., Mcgilliard, M.L., Umberger, C.A. and Hanigan, 
                  M.D. (2010) Interactions of energy and predicted metabolizable 
                  protein in determining nitrogen efficiency in the lactating 
                  dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93(5): 2034-2043. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1777
 PMid:20412918
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 9. Aboozar, M. (2012) Impacts of dietary metabolizable protein 
                  on performance and ruminal parameters of Holstein cows at 
                  early lactation. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci., 2(2): 102- 108. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 10. Lee, C., Hristov, A. N., Heyler, K. S. and Cassidy, T. W. 
                  (2012) Effect of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid 
                  supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and 
                  ammonia emission from manure in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 
                  95(9): 5253-5268. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5366
 PMid:22916930
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 11. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, Association of 
                  Official Analytical Chemists. 18th ed. Virginia, USA. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 12. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991) 
                  Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism and 
                  nutritional implications. In dairy cattle. Methods for dietary 
                  fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides 
                  in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 13. Licitra. G., Harnandez, T.M. and Van Soest, P.J. (1996). 
                  Standardizations of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of 
                  ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 57: 347-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
 |  
                  |  |  
                  | 14. NRC. (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th 
                  Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 15. AFRC. (1992) Nutritive requirements of ruminant animal: 
                  Protein Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. CAB Int. Walling 
                  Ford. Oxon, 62: 787-835. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 16. Ramirez, R.G., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, H., Morales- Rodriguez, 
                  R., Cerrillo-Soto, A., Juarez-Reyes, A., Garcia- Dessommes, 
                  G.J. and Guerrero-Cervantes, M. (2009) Chemical composition 
                  and dry matter digestion of some native and cultivated grasses 
                  in Mexico. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 54: 150–162. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 17. Statistical packages for social sciences 16.0. (2010). 
                  SPSS Inc., 233, South walker Drive, 11th floor, Chicago, USA. 
                  II. 60606. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 18. CNCP. (2003) The net carbohydrate and protein system for 
                  evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. CNCPS 
                  Version 5.0., Cornell University. 130 Morrison Hall, Ethaca, 
                  New York. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 19. Singh, R. and Kundu, S.S. (2008) Estimates of energy and 
                  protein fractions of concentrate ingredients used in India. 
                  Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 25 (4): 302-312. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 20. Sampath, K.T., Rao, A.S. and Sampath, S.R. (1989) Ruminal 
                  protein degradability of certain feedstuffs by nylon bag 
                  technique. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 59 (10): 1304-1307. |  
                  |  |  
                  | 21. Wadhwa, M., Makkar, G.S. and Ichhponani, J.S. (1993) In 
                  sacco degradability of protein supplements used in ruminant 
                  ration. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 63 (6): 684-686. |  |