| 
              
              
              Open Access  
 
              
              
              
              Research 
              
              
(Published 
				online: 17-07-2016)  
              11. 
				
				Seroprevalence of human brucellosis in and 
				around Jammu, India, using different serological tests -
				
				
				H. K. Sharma, S. K. Kotwal, D. K. Singh, M. A. Malik, Arvind 
				Kumar, Rajagunalan
				
				
				and M. Singh 
              
              Veterinary World, 9(7): 742-746   
              
   
                
                
doi: 
              
				
				10.14202/vetworld.2016.742-746 
                
				  
				
				H. K. Sharma:
				
              
              	Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Veterinary 
				Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of 
				Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 
				India; harshvphe@gmail.com 
				
				S. K. Kotwal:
				
              
              Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Veterinary 
				Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of 
				Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 
				India; kotwalsk@yahoo.co.in 
				
				D. K. Singh:
				
              
              Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health, Brucella Laboratory, Indian Veterinary 
				Research Institute, Izzatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India; 
				dks_bly@yahoo.com 
				
				M. A. Malik:
				
              
              Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Veterinary 
				Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of 
				Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 
				India; malikskuast@yahoo.com 
				
				Arvind Kumar:
				
              
              Division of 
				Livestock Products Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences 
				and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural 
				Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India; 
				drarvindlpt@gmail.com 
				
				Rajagunalan:
				
              
              Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health, Brucella Laboratory, Indian Veterinary 
				Research Institute, Izzatnagar, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India; 
				drgunavet@gmail.com 
				
				M. Singh:
				
              
              Division of 
				Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Veterinary 
				Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Sher-e-Kashmir University of 
				Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, 
				India; manindersingh2k2@gmail.com   
				
				Received: 24-04-2016, Accepted: 11-06-2016, Published online: 
				17-07-2016   
				
              	
              	Corresponding author: 
              	H. K. 
				Sharma, e-mail: harshvphe@gmail.com 
 
              Citation: 
				Sharma HK, Kotwal SK, Singh DK, Malik MA, Kumar A, Rajagunalan, 
				Singh M (2016) Seroprevalence of human brucellosis in and around 
				Jammu, India, using different serological tests, Veterinary 
				World, 9(7): 742-746. 
 
              
				Abstract 
 
				Aim: 
				Brucellosis 
				is a disease of zoonotic importance as it affects both human as 
				well as animal’s health, and therefore, directly affects animal 
				productivity and human efficiency. Therefore, a study was 
				conducted to estimate the seroprevalence of brucellosis in 
				humans in Jammu and surrounding areas.  
				Materials and 
				Methods: 
				A total of 121 
				sera samples from humans occupied with professional related to 
				animals were collected and tested for anti-Brucella 
				antibodies by Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), modified RBPT (mRBPT), 
				standard tube agglutination test (STAT), and indirect 
				enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA). Sampling was done 
				keeping in view with the occupation, sex, and age.  
				Results:
				The 
				overall seroprevalence of brucellosis recorded was 4.96%. The 
				test-wise seroprevalence was 9.91% by RBPT, 9.91% by mRBPT, 
				9.09% by STAT, and 16.52% by I-ELISA. The prevalence of 
				brucellosis was higher in >35-50 years age group compared to 
				>20-35 years and >50-65 years. Sex-wise seroprevalence was 
				higher in males than females. Taking I-ELISA as standard, the 
				relative sensitivities of mRBPT, RBPT, and I-ELISA were in the 
				order of mRBPT=RBPT>STAT. All the tests revealed high 
				specificity values; however, among different serological tests, 
				I-ELISA detected a maximum number of positive sera samples.
				 
				Conclusions:
				The 
				prevalence of brucellosis was found to be approximately 5%. The 
				adult (>35-50 years) age male group was most vulnerable. The 
				routine diagnosis of brucellosis involved the conventional 
				serological tests, viz., RBPT and STAT, but each was 
				associated with drawbacks which could give either false-positive 
				or false-negative interpretation. Therefore, it is always 
				recommended to use a battery of tests in the diagnosis of 
				brucellosis.  
				
				Keywords: 
				
				brucellosis, humans, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, 
				Rose Bengal plate test, seroprevalence, standard tube 
				agglutination test. 
 
              References 
 
				
					| 1. Mammeri, A. (2015) Persistence factors of brucellosis in 
					humans and animals: Priority of vulgarization and sanitary 
					education in developing countries. J. Anim. Sci. Adv., 
					5(10): 1422-1429. |  
					|  |  
					| 2. Zhen, Q., Lu, Y., Yuan, X., Qiu, Y., Xu, J., Li, W., Ke, 
					Y., Yu, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y. and Chen, Z.(2013) 
					Asymptomatic brucellosis infection in humans: Implications 
					for diagnosis and prevention. Clin. Microbiol. Infect., 
					19(9): 395-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12250
 PMid:23668532
 |  
					|  |  
					| 3. Baddour, M.M. (2012) Diagnosis of brucellosis in humans: 
					A review. J. Vet. Adv., 2(4): 149-156. |  
					|  |  
					| 4. Karshima, S.N. (2012), A Multidisciplinary approach in 
					the control of zoonoses in Nigeria: A review. J. Vet. Adv., 
					2(12): 557-567. |  
					|  |  
					| 5. WHO. (2016) Human Brucellosis. Available from: 
					http://www.who.int/zoonoses/diseases/brucellosis 
					surveillance.pdf. Accessed on 21-01-2016. |  
					|  |  
					| 6. Da Silva Mol, J.P., De Araujo Franca, S., Da Paixao, T.A. 
					and Santos, R.L. (2012)Laboratorial diagnosis of 
					brucellosis. R. Bras. Ci. Vet., 19(3): 117-126. |  
					|  |  
					| 7. Alton, G.G., Jones, L.M. and Pietz, D.E. (1975) 
					Laboratory Techniques in Brucellosis. WHO Monograph Series 
					55.WHO, Geneva. |  
					|  |  
					| 8. Singh, R.K. (2008)Prevalence of Brucellosis 
					amongRuminants and Comparison of Serological Tests. M.V.Sc. 
					Thesis. Deemed University, IVRI, Izatnagar, India. |  
					|  |  
					| 9. Kaltungo, B.Y., Saidu, S.N.A., Sackey, A.K.B. and Kazeem, 
					H.M. (2014) A review on diagnostic techniques for 
					brucellosis. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 13(1):1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.13442
 |  
					|  |  
					| 10. Olsen, S.C.(2013) Recent developments in livestock and 
					wildlife brucellosis vaccination. World organization for 
					animal health.Sci. Tech. Rev., 32(1): 207-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.32.1.2201
 |  
					|  |  
					| 11. WHO. (1997) The Development of New Improved Brucellosis 
					Vaccine. WHO/EMC/ZD1/98.14, Geneva. |  
					|  |  
					| 12. Kadri, S.M., Rukhsana, A., Laharwal, M.A. and Tanvir, M. 
					(2000) Seroprevalence of brucellosis in Kashmir (India) 
					among patients with pyrexia of unknown origin. J. Indian 
					Med. Assoc., 98: 170-1. PMid:11016178
 |  
					|  |  
					| 13. Agasthya, A.S., Isloor, S. and Prabhudas, K. (2007) 
					Brucellosis in high risk group individuals. Indian J. Med. 
					Microbiol., 25: 28-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.31058
 PMid:17377349
 |  
					|  |  
					| 14. Ferreira, A.C., Cardoso, R., Travassos Dias, I., 
					Mariano, I., Belo, A., Rolão Preto, I., Manteigas, A., Pina 
					Fonseca, A. and Correa De Sa, M.I. (2003) Evaluation of a 
					modified Rose Bengal test and an Indirect enzyme-linked 
					immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis 
					infection in sheep. Vet. Res., 34: 297-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003005
 PMid:12791239
 |  
					|  |  
					| 15. Sharma, V.K., Savalia, C.V., Selvam, D.T. and Darekar, 
					S.D. (2006) Seroprevalence of caprine and ovine brucellosis 
					in Mehsana and Patan districts of Gujarat. Intas Polivet, 7: 
					316-318. |  
					|  |  
					| 16. Singh, M. (2009) Comparison of ELISA with other 
					Serological Tests in Diagnosis of Brucellosis in Small 
					Ruminants. M. V. Sc. Thesis. Deemed University, IVRI, 
					Izatnagar, India. |  
					|  |  
					| 17. Nielsen, K. (2002) Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology. 
					Vet. Microbiol., 90: 447-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00229-8
 |  
					|  |  
					| 18. OIE. (2008)Bovine brucellosis. Manual of Standards for 
					Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines.OIE, Paris.p624-659. |  
					|  |  
					| 19. Samaha, H., Rowaily, M.A., Khoudair, R.M. and Ashour, 
					H.M. (2008) Multicenter study of brucellosis in Egypt. Emerg. 
					Infect. Dis., 12: 1916-1918. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1412.071452
 PMid:19046520 PMCid:PMC2634613
 |  
					|  |  
					| 20. Noviello, S., Gallo, R., Kelly, M., Limberger, R.J., 
					DeAngelis, K., Cain, L., Wallace, B. and Dumas, N. (2004) 
					Laboratory-acquired brucellosis. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 10: 
					1848-1850. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1010.040076
 PMid:15504276 PMCid:PMC3323255
 |  
					|  |  
					| 21. Nielsen, K. and Gall, D. (2001) Fluorescence 
					polarization assay for the diagnosis of brucellosis: A 
					review. J. Immunoassay, 22: 183-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/IAS-100104705
 PMid:11506271
 |  
					|  |  
					| 22. Park, K. (2009) Preventive and Social Medicine. 
					Banarsidas Bhanot, Iabalpur. p617. |  
					|  |  
					| 23. Rashid, M., Baru, P., Sudhan, N.A., Azmi, S., Kotwal, 
					S.K. and Bhatti, S. (2008) Seroprevalence of brucellosis in 
					goats and women. J. Vet. Public Health, 6(2): 115-116. |  |