doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.17-21
This article in [PMC] [Scopus] [DOAJ] [Google Scholar]
Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]
Article history: Received: 30-03-2016, Accepted: 29-11-2016, Published online: 09-01-2017
Corresponding author: Sandeep Dhillod
E-mail: sandeepdhlln@gmail.com
Citation: Dhillod S, Kar D, Patil CS, Sahu S, Singh N (2017) Study of the dairy characters of lactating Murrah buffaloes on the basis of body parts measurements, Veterinary World, 10(1): 17-21.Aim: The aim of the study was to correlate the milk yield of Murrah buffaloes with certain body parts measurements.
Materials and Methods: A total of 70 lactating Murrah buffaloes were selected from Buffalo Farm, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Hisar and were randomly selected in a range from first to fifth parity. Traits studied were 305 days milk yield (MY), body weight (BW), body length (BL), muzzle width (MW), height at wither (HW), abdominal girth (AG), chest girth (CG), body depth fore, body depth rear, hip bone distance (HBD), pin bone distance (PBD), skin thickness (STK), and tail length (TL). Data were collected and statically analyzed by Pearson's correlation method.
Results: The result of this study showed that Murrah buffaloes had the average 2604.8±39.5 kg for MY, 556.1±4.9 kg for BW, and 152.2±0.8 cm for BL. This study showed that buffaloes had positive significant (p<0.05) correlation between MY and BW (0.26). Highly significant (p<0.01) correlation was observed between MY and AG (0.64), MW (0.42). Significant (p<0.01) negative correlation was observed between MY and STK (-0.79). Different body part measurements (BW, BL, HW, AG, CG, MW, TL, BD, PBD, HBD, STK) were significantly correlated with each other.
Conclusion: This study can be helpful as a selection tool to enhance and evaluate the production potential by setting standards of Murrah buffalo breed. BW, abdominal growth, muzzle thickness, and STK were found key factors while selecting a dairy Murrah buffalo.
Keywords: body parts measurements, correlation, dairy characters, regression.
1. BAHS. (2012) Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Fisheries, Government of India.
2. FAO. (2011) The State of Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nation, Rome.
3. Sethi, R.K. (2010) Progeny Testing for Genetic Improvement in Buffaloes, Proceedings of International Buffalo Conference, 1-4 February. New Delhi. p85-91.
4. Madan, M.L. (2010) Concerns and Conflicts in Buffalo Production, Proceedings of International Buffalo Conference, 1-4 February. New Delhi. p1-6. PMid:20491616
5. Singh, K.P. and Singh, I. (2015) Buffalo diversity in India: Breeds and defined populations. Dairy Year Book (2014-15). p33-36.
6. DNA. (2012) India to Produce 191 Million Tonnes of Milk by 2020, 27th August, Held at Bangalore, India.
7. Lin, C.Y., Lee, A.J., Mcallister, A.J., Batra, T.R., Roy, G.L., Vesley, J.A., Wauthy, J.M. and Winter, K.A. (1987) Intercorrelations among milk productiontraits and body and udder measurements in Holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 70: 2385-2393. [Crossref]
8. Ugur, F. (2005) Relationships between body measurements of dairy calves at six month of ages and age at first calving and milk production. J. Cent. Eur. Agric., 6(2): 191-194.
9. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994) Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
10. Agasti, M.K., Choudhari, G. and Dhar, N.L. (1984) Genetic studies on some of the physical traits of the Jersey X Hariana and Holstein X Hariana crossbred cows. Indian Vet. J., 61: 664-669.
11. Bharadwaj, A., Dixit, V.B., Sethi, R.K. and Khanna, S. (2007) Association of breed characteristics with milk production in Murrah buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 77: 1011-1016.
12. Bhatnagar, D.C. and Choudhry, N.C. (1960) Relationship between milk production and certain body measurements in Murrah buffaloes. Curr. Sci., 29: 193-194.
13. Desai, R.N. and Sharma, M.D. (1962) Relationship between physical characters and milk yield in Haryana cattle. Indian Vet. J., 39: 72-77.
14. Musa, A.M., Mohammed, S.A., Abdalla, S.A. and Elamin, K.M. (2011) Linear body measurements as an indicator of Kenana cattle milk production. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 1: 259-262.
15. Ahmad, N., Abdullah, M., Javed, K., Khaid, M.S., Babar, M.E., Younas, U. and Nasrullah. (2013) Relationship between body measurements and milk production in Nili Ravi buffaloes maintained at commercial farms in peri-urban vicinity of Lahore. Buffalo Bull., 32: 792-796.
16. Bhakat, M., Singh, C., Mohanty, T.K. and Raina, V.S. (2010) Body condition scoring system and its relationship with physical and production parameters of crossbred cows and buffaloes. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 63: 122-127.
17. (a). Kar, D., Varma, A.K., Chhikara, S.K., Singh, I. and Vinayak, A.K. (2014) To study the correlation between muzzle width over nasal septum, brisket width, rump width and skin thickness at neck region with milk production in lactating Murrah buffaloes. In: Proceeding: XXI Annual Convention of ISAPM and National Seminar, Held at AAU, Anand, January, 28-30, 2014. (b). Kar, D., Kumari, Varma, A.K., Chhikara, S.K., Singh, I. and Dalal, D.S. (2014) Study of correlation between different body measurements with milk production in lactating Murrah buffaloes. In: Proceeding: XXI Silver Jubliee Convention of ISAPM and National Seminar, Held at Navsari, October, 9-11th, 2014.
18. Patel, A.K. and Tomar, O.S. (1990) Prediction of production performance based on pre-partum body measurements in crossbred heifers. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 43: 35-39.
19. Vohra, V., Niranjan, S.K., Mishra, A.K., Jamuna, V., Chopra, A., Sharma, N. and Jeong, D.K. (2014) Phenotypic characterization and multivariate analysis to explain body confermation in lesser known buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) from North India. Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 28: 311-317. [Crossref] [PubMed] [PMC]
20. Javed, K., Mirza, R.H., Abdullah, M., Naseer, T. and Akhtar, P.M. (2013) Studies on linear type traits and morphometric measurements in Nili Ravi buffaloes of Pakistan. Buffalo Bull., 32: 780-783.<