Open Access
Research (Published online: 12-04-2021)
9. Comparison between five coprological methods for the diagnosis of Balantidium coli cysts in fecal samples from pigs
Juan Carlos Pinilla, Andrea Isabel Pinilla and Angel Alberto Florez
Veterinary World, 14(4): 873-877

Juan Carlos Pinilla: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Exact, Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Andrea Isabel Pinilla: Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Health, Industrial University of Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Angel Alberto Florez: Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Exact, Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

doi: www.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.873-877

Share this article on [Facebook] [LinkedIn]

Article history: Received: 24-07-2020, Accepted: 23-02-2021, Published online: 12-04-2021

Corresponding author: Juan Carlos Pinilla

E-mail: jcpinilla65@gmail.com

Citation: Pinilla JC, Pinilla AI, Florez AA (2021) Comparison between five coprological methods for the diagnosis of Balantidium coli cysts in fecal samples from pigs, Veterinary World, 14(4): 873-877.
Abstract

Background and Aim: Balantidium coli is a protozoan that can infect humans and non-human primates, being the domestic pigs the animals most affected by this parasite. This study aimed to compare the performance of five coprological methods for diagnosis of Balantidium coli cysts in fecal samples from pigs.

Materials and Methods: From September to December 2019, 558 fecal samples were collected from the rectum of backyard pigs in the Bucaramanga metropolitan area, Colombia. The average age of the sampled animals was 3-4 months. Fecal samples collected were tested using the following coprological techniques: Direct examination with Lugol's iodine solution, buffered saline, centrifugation/flotation and McMaster techniques, and Ziehl–Neelsen method.

Results: The results indicate that B. coli cysts were diagnosed most frequently through direct examination with Lugol's iodine solution (52.7% of the samples) followed by direct examination with a buffered saline solution (37.6%). Moderate concordance (k=0.41; p<0.05) was determined between direct method with Lugol's iodine and buffered saline solution, McMaster and buffered saline (k=0.35; p<0.05), and centrifugation/flotation and buffered saline (k=0.28; p<0.05) showed a fair degree of concordance. The rest of the comparisons were classified as poor. The flotation techniques (centrifugation/ flotation and McMaster) did not show good recovery of cysts.

Conclusion: It is concluded that the most efficient method for diagnosing this parasitosis was to an association between direct examination with Lugol's iodine solution and buffered saline.

Keywords: Balantidium, parasite, pigs, protozoan.