Vet World   Vol.17   September-2024  Article - 10 

Research Article

Veterinary World, 17(9): 2036-2043

https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.2036-2043

Comparative biochemical analysis of platelet-rich plasma-chitosan and platelet-rich fibrin-chitosan for treating tibial bone defects in rabbits

Sajjad Javaid1, Hamad Bin Rashid1, Ayesha Safdar1, and Mamoona Chaudhry2
1. Department of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
2. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. 

Background and Aim: Fracture healing can cause serious complications, both preoperatively and postoperatively, including malunion or non-union. Biomaterials can enhance the fracture healing process. This study aimed to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-chitosan and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)-chitosan on the basis of biochemical parameters for fracture treatment in rabbits. 

Materials and Methods: This study involved 12 clinically healthy rabbits. After preparing PRP and PRF, a 3-mm bone defect was created in the tibia of each rabbit. The animals were divided randomly into two groups (A and B). Group A received PRP-Chitosan, and Group B received PRF-Chitosan. Bone healing was assessed using biochemical parameters (calcium [Ca], phosphorus [P], serum alkaline phosphatase [ALP], and osteocalcin [Ocn]) at 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week postoperatively. The data were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (p < 0.05) with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences statistical software. 

Results: Group-wise comparison showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the groups, except for ALP levels, which were significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p < 0.05). In the week-wise comparison, there was a significant difference between both groups, as Ca and ALP levels showed significant differences at all weeks postoperatively, whereas Ocn showed a significant difference at 2- and 4-week postoperatively (p < 0.05). However, there was no difference in P levels between the groups at any post-operative week (p > 0.05). 

Conclusion: Both combinations enhanced bone regeneration. However, PRF-Chitosan is a better combination for bone repair than PRP-Chitosan. There were some limitations of this study, such as a small sample size, only male rabbits were used, and a lack of mechanical testing; these limitations should be addressed in future studies. The insights gained from the present study may open a new approach to the use of a combination of biomaterials for bone healing, which should be further investigated clinically and in other animal models as a future scope. 

Keywords: chitosan, fractures, platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, rabbits, tibia.


How to cite this article: Javaid S, Rashid HB, Safdar A, and Chaudhry M (2024) Comparative biochemical analysis of platlet-rich plasma-chitosan and platelet-rich fibrin-chitosan for treating tibial bone defects in rabbits, Veterinary World, 17(9): 2036-2043.

Received: 2024-05-14    Accepted: 2024-08-19    Published online: 2024-09-13

Corresponding author: Sajjad Javaid and Hamad Bin Rashid    E-mail: sajjad.1@hotmail.com and hamad.chaudhry@uvas.edu.pk

DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.2036-2043

Copyright: Javaid, et al. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http:// creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.