Vet World   Vol.18   October-2025  Article - 18 

Research Article

Veterinary World, 18(10): 3162-3173

https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2025.3162-3173

Pet owners’ perspectives on veterinary biobanking in Latvia: Awareness, motivations, ethical concerns, and willingness to participate

Gundega Stelfa1 ORCID, Kaspars Kovalenko2 ORCID, and Liga Kovalcuka1 ORCID

1. Clinical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, K. Helmana 8, Jelgava, LV-3004, Latvia.

2. Institute of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, K. Helmana 8, Jelgava, LV-3004, Latvia.

Background and Aim: Veterinary biobanking advances translational research, companion animal health, and the ethical reuse of samples. Its success depends on public engagement and the pet owners’ willingness to contribute biological sam­ples. However, awareness and attitudes toward veterinary biobanking remain largely unexplored in the Baltic region. This study aimed to assess Latvian pet owners’ awareness, willingness to donate, motivations, and concerns regarding veterinary biobanking, and to identify demographic and professional factors influencing participation.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through social media and veterinary clinics across Latvia between April and May 2025. The questionnaire included 49 items covering awareness, willingness to donate, moti­vations, concerns, and demographics. Data from 164 pet owners were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square tests with Bonferroni correction, and logistic regression.

Results: Only 22% of respondents had prior awareness of veterinary biobanks. Despite this, 76% were willing to donate samples if their pet was seriously ill, and 67% even if their pet was healthy. Motivations included altruism (helping other animals), supporting veterinary research, and potential treatment benefits for their own pets. Key concerns centered on confidentiality (91%), the right to withdraw samples (60%), and control of sample use (45%). Professional background was significantly associated with both awareness (p = 0.0004) and willingness to donate (p = 0.0013). Logistic regression con­firmed that respondents in medical or veterinary professions were more likely to support donation (odds ratio = 3.31, 95% confidence interval = 1.54–7.12, p = 0.002). No significant associations were found with age, gender, education, or religion.

Conclusion: This first Baltic survey reveals that Latvian pet owners strongly support veterinary biobanking despite limited awareness. Altruism and the expected benefits of research drive participation, while ethical expectations regarding confi­dentiality, consent, and transparency remain crucial. The findings provide a foundation for developing national veterinary biobanking strategies, improving public communication, and integrating Latvia into European One Health and translational research infrastructures.

Keywords: comparative medicine, One Health, pet owners, public attitudes, translational research, veterinary biobank.

How to cite this article: Stelfa G, Kovalenko K, and Kovalcuka L (2025) Pet owners’ perspectives on veterinary biobanking in Latvia: Awareness, motivations, ethical concerns, and willingness to participate, Veterinary World, 18(10): 3162-3173.

Received: 14-07-2025   Accepted: 09-10-2025   Published online: 26-10-2025

Corresponding author: Gundega Stelfa    E-mail: gundega.stelfa@lbtu.lv

DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.3162-3173

Copyright: Stelfa, et al. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http:// creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.